Key result
Blood pressure changes at the carotid sinus, aortic arch, and cardiopulmonary receptors significantly predicted R-R interval changes (r=0.82, P<0.00001).
Observational (n=13)
Effect estimate: r 0.82
p-value: p=< 0.00001
Changes in aortic arch pressure account for the majority of baroreflex-mediated R-R interval variability compared to carotid sinus and cardiopulmonary receptors.
Prioritizes aortic arch input in baroreflex HR control; extends models but leaves open clinical translation.
We evaluated R-R interval changes (delta R-R interval) in 13 subjects (27 +/- 6 yr; 7 men and 6 women) as a function of blood pressure changes at the carotid sinus and aortic arch and central venous pressure changes at the cardiopulmonary receptors. Neck chamber pressure and suction were used to change pressure at the carotid sinus while lower body negative pressure, phenylephrine infusion, and nitroprusside infusion were used to change pressure at the carotid sinus (delta CSP), aortic arch (delta AAP), and cardiopulmonary receptors (delta CPP). Random effects regression analysis showed a significant linear relationship for delta R-R interval (-1.75 + 1.64 delta CSP + 15.40 delta AAP + 29.02 delta CPP + error), and the correlation (r) between the observed and predicted delta R-R interval was 0.82 (P < 0.00001). Sixty-seven percent of the delta R-R interval variability observed in the study is explained by the model. delta AAP accounts for approximately 63%, delta CSP for 14%, and delta CPP for 23% of the explained delta R-R interval.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Desai et al. (1997) reported an observational. Blood pressure changes at the carotid sinus, aortic arch, and cardiopulmonary receptors was evaluated on R-R interval changes (delta R-R interval) (r 0.82, p=< 0.00001). Blood pressure changes at the carotid sinus, aortic arch, and cardiopulmonary receptors significantly predicted R-R interval changes (r=0.82, P<0.00001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: