Key result
A second balloon aortic valvuloplasty for recurrent aortic stenosis significantly reduced the valve gradient from 61.4 to 26.0 mm Hg (P<0.01), effectively delaying surgical intervention.
Why the study?
Does repeat balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV2) improve outcomes and delay surgical intervention in children with recurrent aortic stenosis?
Observational (n=43)
No
Does repeat balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV2) improve outcomes and delay surgical intervention in children with recurrent aortic stenosis?
Repeat balloon aortic valvuloplasty effectively reduces valve gradient and delays the need for surgical intervention in children with recurrent aortic stenosis, despite an associated increase in aortic insufficiency.
May support repeat BAV to delay surgery in children with recurrent AS; leaves open durability and aortic insufficiency progression.
OBJECTIVE: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is the primary therapy for congenital aortic stenosis (AS). Recurrent AS following initial BAV or initial surgical valvotomy (SV) may require a second BAV (BAV2). We sought to determine the longterm outcomes of BAV2. DESIGN: We reviewed all cases of BAV2, defined as BAV following primary BAV or SV between 1988 and 2009. Cases were reviewed for pre- and post-BAV2 echocardiographic and procedural details. SETTING: Tertiary care dedicated children's hospital. PATIENTS: Between 1985 and 2009, 43 patients underwent BAV2 (23 primary SV, 20 primary BAV) at median age 1.9 years (1 month-21 years) and median weight 15 (3.3-55) kg. INTERVENTIONS: BAV2 performed following primary SV or primary BAV. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We evaluated the following endpoints: ≥ moderate AI post-BAV2, aortic valve replacement (AVR), additional BAV or SV post-BAV2, death and heart transplantation. RESULTS: The gradient decreased from 61.4 ± 16.0 mm Hg to 26.0 ± 13.6 post-BAV2 (P < 0.01). Gradient prior to BAV2 was higher in primary SV patients (66 ± 13 mm Hg) than in primary BAV patients (56 ± 18 mm Hg, P = 0.04). 24 patients had no further events after BAV2, while 19 patients (44%) experienced 23 events including: AVR (n = 8), SV (n = 6), BAV3 (n = 2), death (n = 5), and transplant (n = 1). Regression demonstrated that adverse events were associated with higher post-BAV2 gradient (P < 0.01). Repeat intervention on the aortic valve and AVR were associated with higher post BAV2 gradient (P = 0.04, P = 0.01). Prior to BAV2, 7 patients (17%) had AI > mild, compared to 21 (51%) patients after BAV2. Cox regression revealed that primary BAV was associated with development of AI > mild after BAV2 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: BAV2 is associated with decreased valve gradient, though with an increase in AI. However, residual AS, not AI, is associated with poor outcomes following BAV2. BAV2 effectively treats recurrent AS and postpones need for surgical intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petit et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Recurrent aortic stenosis (n=43). Second balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV2) vs. Pre-BAV2 baseline was evaluated on Aortic valve gradient (mm Hg) (p=<0.01). A second balloon aortic valvuloplasty for recurrent aortic stenosis significantly reduced the valve gradient from 61.4 to 26.0 mm Hg (P<0.01), effectively delaying surgical intervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: