Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial reveals lower blood loss with knitted grafts in aortoiliac surgery, suggesting woven grafts remain cost-effective unless bleeding risk is high.
BACKGROUND: Despite the theoretical advantages of coating knitted grafts with a material designed to reduce blood loss, their performance has not been directly compared with woven grafts in a prospective randomized trial. The aim of this study was to compare the graft handling qualities and operative blood loss of the two types of arterial prosthesis, as well as complication rate and patient survival at 1 year. METHODS: A total of 267 consecutive patients having surgery for occlusive or aneurysmal disease of the aortoiliac arteries were randomized to receive woven (141 patients) or knitted collagen-impregnated Dacron (126 patients) grafts. Graft patency was assessed on discharge and at 1 year by duplex imaging. RESULTS: Mean(s.d.) intraoperative blood loss was statistically greater with woven grafts (1690(1424) ml) compared with knitted (1363(1172) ml) (P = 0.049). An insignificant 1-year increase in mean(s.d.) graft diameter of 1.2(0.2) mm was found at the distal anastomosis in the knitted group. There was no difference in graft patency between the groups and only one graft became infected. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that knitted and woven grafts have similar clinical performance and therefore the less expensive material (woven) should usually be selected unless haemorrhagic complications are anticipated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quarmby et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: