Theoretical analysis demonstrates physical emergence from a six-dimensional meta-field, suggesting black hole deconstruction powers galactic dynamics.
This paper presents the complete framework of CSF-CMT (Coarse-grained String-Field CMT), version vΩ.27. CSF-CMT proposes that the sole physical ontology of the universe is the meta-field ξEO residing in the First Space — a six-dimensional vector field whose six components correspond to six string-empowered modes (gravity G, electromagnetism EM, magnetism M, weak force W, strong force S, repulsion R). Spacetime, matter, fundamental interactions, information, and time are not a priori entities but phenomenological structures emerging from statistical averaging of the meta-field at various coarse-graining scales L_c. The paper is organized as a Lakatosian research programme: the hard core consists of (i) First-Space ontology, (ii) coarse-graining emergence, and (iii) gravitational dominance; the protective belt comprises the six-mode mass spectrum, cross-couplings gAB, and weight functions W_A(L_c). We present the six static features of the meta-field (medium / physical / spatial / continuous / wave-like / interactive) and Axiom 7's dynamic deconstruction-emergence hierarchy as complementary descriptions. We derive the core equation system (the Omega equation, metric generation, light-speed emergence, black-hole deconstruction power, and the gravity-repulsion microsymmetry), and complete a quantitative calculation for Sgr A*: its total deconstruction power of 10³⁵–10³⁷\,W is of the same order as the Galaxy's global dynamical power, suggesting that black-hole deconstruction is a key energy source of galactic dynamics. Compatibility with general relativity, quantum mechanics, the Standard Model, thermodynamics, and MOND is analyzed, followed by S/A/B-graded testable predictions. Honest statement of limitations: internal consistency is complete, but experimental verification is at an early stage, and protective-belt parameters await observational calibration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
单洁 kimik3 (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: