Pre-experimental study demonstrates improved cognitive and holistic science outcomes in pre-senior high school students, highlighting the feasibility of AI chatbots as instructional scaffolds.
Artificial Intelligence offers innovative potential for personalised learning, yet its integration remains hindered by instructional voids and restrictive mobile-device policies globally. This study addresses these challenges by investigating AI-powered chatbots as a scalable scaffolding tool for science learning in resource-constrained settings where a scarcity of personalised instructional resources presents a significant barrier to science outcomes. Employing a pre-experimental single-group pre-test/post-test design, the research assessed changes in cognitive outcomes and holistic competencies among 31 pre-Senior High School students in Ghana using researcher-developed, validated instruments. The intervention integrated the chatbot as a self-directed learning and inquiry support system over four weeks. Qualitative data were analysed thematically and subsequently quantified. Quantitative data were analysed using paired t-tests and the robust Wilcoxon signed-rank test, supplemented by Spearman’s rank-order correlation and Least Absolute Deviations (LAD) regression. Findings revealed statistically significant improvements across the measured domains, with large effect sizes observed for cognitive outcomes (Cohen’s d > 2.0) and moderate-to-large effect sizes for holistic outcomes (Wilcoxon r = 0.41–0.68). The findings suggest that the chatbot functioned as a More Knowledgeable Other (MKO) within the structured learning intervention and may have supported cognitive and self-directed learning processes, consistent with Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) and Self-Determination Theory (SDT) interpretations. Critically, the study found a strong positive correlation (ρ > 0.8) between students’ learning outcomes and their self-reported Perception of Utility. This research provides preliminary evidence on the feasibility and potential value of AI-supported learning for expanding personalised learning opportunities in resource-constrained educational contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Apeadido et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: