Key result
A new generation hand-carried ultrasound device demonstrated a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 88% for detecting pericardial effusion compared to MDCT in cardiothoracic ICU patients.
Why the study?
Does a hand-carried ultrasound device accurately detect pericardial effusion compared to MDCT in cardiothoracic ICU patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=36)
Single-blind
No
Does a hand-carried ultrasound device accurately detect pericardial effusion compared to MDCT in cardiothoracic ICU patients?
Hand-carried ultrasound provides a rapid, reliable, and cost-effective method for diagnosing hemodynamically relevant pericardial effusion in cardiothoracic ICU patients.
May support bedside screening in cardiothoracic ICU; leaves open need for prospective validation against MDCT.
BACKGROUND: Technological advances introduced hand-carried ultrasound (HCU) imagers in daily clinical workflow providing several benefits such as fast bedside availability and prompt diagnosis. PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of a latest generation HCU imager compared to contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for the detection of pericardial effusion (PE) in cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients from a cardiothoracic ICU were enrolled to this study irrespective of their underlying disease. All patients were examined with a new generation HCU for the presence of PE. Definite diagnosis of PE was based on findings of MDCT as standard of reference. Statistical analysis was performed using PASW 18. RESULTS: PE was identified in 20 patients by MDCT (prevalence 56%). The HCU examination was carried out technically successfully in all patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of HCU for the diagnosis of PE were 75%, 88%, 88%, and 74%, respectively. CONCLUSION: HCU provides rapid, practical, reliable, and cost-effective diagnosis of PE in patients on cardiothoracic ICU.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schleder et al. (2012) conducted a cross-sectional in Pericardial effusion (n=36). Hand-carried ultrasound (HCU) vs. Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) was evaluated on Detection of pericardial effusion (Sensitivity 75%, Specificity 88%). A new generation hand-carried ultrasound device demonstrated a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 88% for detecting pericardial effusion compared to MDCT in cardiothoracic ICU patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: