Key result
Postoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine in an 81-year-old woman was associated with a transient coronary spasm, characterized by ST-segment elevation, hypotension, and bradycardia.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Postoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine may be associated with transient coronary vasospasm, highlighting the need for careful monitoring in susceptible patients.
May alert clinicians to possible DEX-associated AV junctional rhythm with ST changes in elderly postoperative patients; leaves open causality in case reports.
This is a case report of an 81-year-old woman who underwent tracheostomy, bilateral cervical dissection, partial tongue resection, radial forearm free flap reconstruction, and split-thickness skin grafting under general anesthesia. After successful surgery, she was moderately sedated postoperatively with intravenous dexmedetomidine (DEX) and fentanyl. The fentanyl was discontinued 5 hours postoperatively. Eight hours after the operation, an atrioventricular junctional rhythm, a 2-mm elevation of the ST segment, and biphasic T waves were detected in lead II that lasted approximately 3 minutes. Hypotension and bradycardia were observed simultaneously with the abnormal electrocardiogram. The next day, a cardiologist examined the patient and suggested that coronary spasm had occurred based on those findings. The transient coronary spasm was likely caused by a combination of various factors including surgical stress and altered autonomic function. However, it is possible that stimulation of α-2 adrenergic receptors induced by DEX may also be linked to the coronary vasospasm that occurred.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sato et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Coronary spasm during postoperative sedation (n=1). Dexmedetomidine was evaluated on Coronary spasm. Postoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine in an 81-year-old woman was associated with a transient coronary spasm, characterized by ST-segment elevation, hypotension, and bradycardia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: