Key result
Atrial fibrillation was associated with worse lower extremity motricity index (53.42 vs 65.58; P=.001) and functional ambulation category scores at 6 months after cerebral infarction.
Why the study?
AF is a leading cause of cerebral infarction, but its association with motor outcomes after cerebral infarction remains unreported.
Does the presence of atrial fibrillation worsen motor outcomes in patients with first-incidence cerebral infarction?
Cohort (n=76)
Does the presence of atrial fibrillation worsen motor outcomes in patients with first-incidence cerebral infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 53.42% vs 65.58%
p-value: p=.001
The presence of atrial fibrillation is associated with poorer recovery of leg motor function and gait in patients following a first-incidence cerebral infarction.
AF was associated with poorer leg motor recovery and gait gains after cerebral infarction; leaves open whether targeted strategies improve outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been a leading cause of cerebral infarction, but the association with motor outcome after cerebral infarction remains unreported. In this study, we attempted to identify whether AF affects motor outcomes after cerebral infarction. METHODS: Seventy-six patients with a first-incidence cerebral infarction and who completed 6 months of rehabilitation were recruited to this retrospective study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of AF (AF and non-AF groups). The upper extremity motricity index, lower extremity motricity index (LMI), modified Brunnstrom classification, and functional ambulation category (FAC) were evaluated, and those results were obtained within the first day and after 6 months of onset. Clinical factors that could affect motor outcome after cerebral infarction were also obtained. RESULTS: Compared with the non-AF group, the AF group had an upper extremity motricity index (47.15 ± 20.30 vs 58.66 ± 19.19; P = .032), LMI (53.42 ± 12.27 vs 65.58 ± 13.86; P = .001), and FAC scores (2.39 ± 0.93 vs 3.35 ± 0.93; P < .001) at 6 months after onset. Moreover, the AF group showed a lower FAC score gain than the non-AF group at 6 months after onset (2.33 ± 0.95 vs 3.28 ± 0.94; P < .001). Multivariate linear regression analyses showed that presence of AF had negative correlation with LMI gain (β = -0.197; P = .010) and FAC gain (β = -0.254; P = .011). CONCLUSION: We observed that AF had a negative effect on the motor outcome of the affected leg and the recovery of gait function in patients with cerebral infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jang et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Cerebral infarction (n=76). Atrial fibrillation vs. No atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Lower extremity motricity index (LMI) at 6 months (p=.001). Atrial fibrillation was associated with worse lower extremity motricity index (53.42 vs 65.58; P=.001) and functional ambulation category scores at 6 months after cerebral infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: