Key result
Atrial fibrillation was associated with significantly less functional improvement after rehabilitation in patients with cerebral infarction, as evidenced by lower gains in FIM scores (5.4 vs 8.7, p=0.001).
Why the study?
Does atrial fibrillation reduce functional improvement in patients with cerebral infarction undergoing rehabilitation?
Cohort (n=87)
No
Does atrial fibrillation reduce functional improvement in patients with cerebral infarction undergoing rehabilitation?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.4% vs 8.7%
p-value: p=0.001
Atrial fibrillation is associated with significantly less functional improvement during rehabilitation in patients with cerebral infarction.
Suggests AF may limit post-stroke rehabilitation efficacy; leaves open whether aggressive rhythm control or tailored physical.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of atrial fibrillation (Af) on the clinical characteristics and rehabilitation outcomes of patients with cerebral infarction. METHODS: We evaluated 87 of 101 consecutive patients with cerebral infarction admitted to the department of physical medicine and rehabilitation during their rehabilitation period. The patients were divided into two groups, Af and non-Af groups. We estimated characteristics of patient demographic features, disease duration, length of hospital stay, other comorbidities and risk factors for stroke, and functional status at admission and at discharge and compared those in patients with and without Af. Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and the PULSES profile (PULSES) were used to evaluate functional status. RESULTS: The number in the Af group was 20 (22.9%) and that of the non-Af group was 67 (77.1%). Demographic features, other comorbidities, motor function, cognitive function, neurological scales, and brain lesions did not differ significantly between the groups. The incidence of coronary artery disease and valvular heart disease were significantly correlated with the incidence of Af in multivariate analysis. Based on FIM, MBI, and PULSES scores, functional improvement in the Af group after rehabilitation was significantly less than that of the non-Af group. CONCLUSION: Af was shown to be associated with a markedly negative result in rehabilitation in patients with cerebral infarction. Thus, early recognition and proper treatment of Af may help patients achieve more effective rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Cerebral infarction (n=87). Atrial fibrillation vs. Non-atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score gain (p=0.001). Atrial fibrillation was associated with significantly less functional improvement after rehabilitation in patients with cerebral infarction, as evidenced by lower gains in FIM scores (5.4 vs 8.7, p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: