Key result
Atrial inhibited pacing in sick sinus node syndrome was associated with low rates of lead failure (5%), atrial fibrillation (3%), and atrioventricular block (6%) over a mean of 32 months.
Why the study?
What is the incidence of complications and the need for rate responsiveness in patients with sick sinus node syndrome receiving atrial inhibited pacemakers?
Population
66 patients with sick sinus node syndrome (mean age 71 +/- 9 years, 32 males)
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
mean 32 +/- 29 months (median 26 months)
Authors
Loading...
May support atrial inhibited pacing in selected sinus node dysfunction; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of durability.
Observational (n=66)
What is the incidence of complications and the need for rate responsiveness in patients with sick sinus node syndrome receiving atrial inhibited pacemakers?
Atrial inhibited pacing is well suited for selected patients with sinus node dysfunction and preserved AV conduction, with a low incidence of complications and limited need for rate-responsive pacemakers.
Kallryd et al. (1989) conducted an observational in Sick sinus node syndrome (n=66). Atrial inhibited pacemakers was evaluated on Incidence of lead failures, chronic atrial tachyarrhythmias, and atrioventricular conduction disturbances. Atrial inhibited pacing in sick sinus node syndrome was associated with low rates of lead failure (5%), atrial fibrillation (3%), and atrioventricular block (6%) over a mean of 32 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: