Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 1, 1989Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Atrial Inhibited Pacing in the Sick Sinus Node Syndrome: Clinical Value and the Demand for Rate Responsiveness

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Atrial inhibited pacing in sick sinus node syndrome was associated with low rates of lead failure (5%), atrial fibrillation (3%), and atrioventricular block (6%) over a mean of 32 months.

Why the study?

What is the incidence of complications and the need for rate responsiveness in patients with sick sinus node syndrome receiving atrial inhibited pacemakers?

Population

66 patients with sick sinus node syndrome (mean age 71 +/- 9 years, 32 males)

Design

Cohort

Follow-up

mean 32 +/- 29 months (median 26 months)

Authors

AKAnders KallrydSkaraborg HospitalIKI KruseMedtronic (United States)
Lars Rydén
Lars RydénPreventive Cardiology

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

May support atrial inhibited pacing in selected sinus node dysfunction; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of durability.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=66)

Structured PICO

What is the incidence of complications and the need for rate responsiveness in patients with sick sinus node syndrome receiving atrial inhibited pacemakers?

P
Population
66 patients (mean age 71 years) with sick sinus node syndrome who received atrial inhibited pacemakers, followed for a mean of 32 months.
E
Exposure
Atrial inhibited pacemakers
O
Outcome
Incidence of lead failures, chronic atrial tachyarrhythmias, atrioventricular conduction disturbances, and the need for rate responsive pacingsafety

Atrial inhibited pacing is well suited for selected patients with sinus node dysfunction and preserved AV conduction, with a low incidence of complications and limited need for rate-responsive pacemakers.

Cite This Study

Kallryd et al. (1989) conducted an observational in Sick sinus node syndrome (n=66). Atrial inhibited pacemakers was evaluated on Incidence of lead failures, chronic atrial tachyarrhythmias, and atrioventricular conduction disturbances. Atrial inhibited pacing in sick sinus node syndrome was associated with low rates of lead failure (5%), atrial fibrillation (3%), and atrioventricular block (6%) over a mean of 32 months.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9e924cf7492f5efe95eca7https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1989.tb05033.x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Serial electrophysiologic studies after single chamber atrial pacemaker implantation in patients with symptomatic sinus node dysfunction1984 · 20 citations
  2. 2Coronary sinus pacing clinical follow-up.1978 · 53 citations
  3. 3Atrioventricular Conduction Defects in Patients with Sinus Bradycardia1971 · 159 citations
  4. 4Atrio‐Ventricular and Ventriculo‐Atrial Conduction Times in Patients Undergoing Pacemaker Implant1983 · 90 citations
  5. 5Atrial Fibrillation During A‐V Sequential Pacing1982 · 69 citations