Key result
Correcting T-wave alternans (TWA) magnitude with T-wave amplitude is unnecessary for predicting life-threatening arrhythmias, as TWA magnitude does not significantly correlate with T-wave amplitude.
Correcting T-wave alternans magnitude with T-wave amplitude is argued to be unnecessary and potentially detrimental to its predictive value for life-threatening arrhythmias.
We appreciate efforts by Dr Madias to develop T-wave alternans (TWA) index based on the theory that TWA magnitude is affected by T-wave amplitude and should, therefore, be corrected.1 He suggested that there may be limitations in correlating TWA magnitude data derived from the J-point to the end of the T-wave with the corresponding peak of the T-wave.2 We could not measure the area under the ECG curve from the J-point to the end of the T-wave interval using the current analysis device. Therefore, it was not feasible to determine the relationship between peak TWA magnitude and the area under the corresponding T-wave as he proposed. However, the TWA values at the peak of the T-wave were nearly equal to maximum TWA values in the three patients who developed ventricular tachyarrhythmias, as illustrated in figures 2 and 3 in our paper.3 Notably, in the patient with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and sustained ventricular tachycardia, TWA at the peak of the T-wave exactly matched the maximum TWA in all phases (figure 2 of our paper).3 Thus, our finding that there was no significant positive correlation between TWA magnitude and the corresponding T-wave amplitude is sufficient evidence to prove that the upsurge in TWA was not merely a consequence of increased T-wave amplitude but provided a measure of the degree of cardiac electrical instability. Furthermore, the presence of visible macroscopic TWA before the onset of ventricular tachyarrhythmias is the most decisive proof. At this stage, given the lack of evidence that the predictive value of TWA index1 is superior to TWA magnitude itself, adjustment with T-wave amplitude may merely dilute the performance of TWA magnitude for prediction of life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. Moreover, in monitoring emergency patients who are at high risk of impending lethal arrhythmias, it may be cumbersome to compute TWA index. Based on our experience, we believe that there is no need for correcting visible macroscopic TWA, which signals ‘clear and present danger’. Conflict of interest: Dr Verrier is an inventor of the Modified Moving Average method for TWA analysis with patent assigned to Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and licensed by GE Healthcare and Medtronic Inc. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takasugi et al. (2011) conducted a letter in Life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. T-wave alternans magnitude correction with T-wave amplitude vs. Uncorrected T-wave alternans magnitude was evaluated on Prediction of life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. Correcting T-wave alternans (TWA) magnitude with T-wave amplitude is unnecessary for predicting life-threatening arrhythmias, as TWA magnitude does not significantly correlate with T-wave amplitude.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: