Key result
In a Sri Lankan population, the prevalence of aortic arch variations was 10%, with no significant gender influence on the branching pattern (OR 0.792).
Why the study?
Aortic arch branching patterns impact thoracic surgical and angiographic outcomes and show geographical variations, prompting the description of these variants in a Sri Lankan population.
Cross-Sectional (n=219)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Variations in the branching pattern of the aortic arch are present in 10% of a Sri Lankan population, highlighting the need for population-specific anatomical knowledge to minimize vascular injuries during thoracic and angiographic interventions.
Background /ObjectivesBranching pattern of aortic arch (AA) has a direct impact on the outcome of thoracic surgical and angiographic procedures. Geographical variations in the branching pattern of AA has been described. Hence, this descriptive cross sectional study describes the AA variations in a Sri Lankan population compared to the available global statistics.MethodsContrast-enhanced computed tomographic studies (CTC) of thorax (n=219) performed in males (49.3%) and females (50.7%); aged 59±17 years (range: 4 to 96 years), were evaluated. Branching patterns of AA were categorized into seven types as described by Popieluszko et al.ResultsFour AA types were identified in the study population: Type 1 (90%; n=197), Type 2 (n=10, 4.6%), Type 3 (n=8, 3.7%) and Type 6 AA (n=4; 1.8%). The prevalence of AA variations was 10%. Type 1 was the most prevalent pattern in both genders: female-91%; males-88.9%. The most prevalent AA variant in females was Type 2 (n=6; 5.4%); males Type 3 (n=5; 4.6%). However, the branching pattern of AA has not demonstrated a significant gender influence (Odds: 0.792; 95% CI: 0.327 - 1.917; p=0.605). ConclusionVariations in branching pattern of AA is as high as 10% among Sri Lankans. Thus, an in-depth knowledge on population specific prevalence of AA variants would influence the modifications surgical approaches and the choice of angiographic catheters to be utilized, which in turn, would minimize inadvertent vascular injuries during thoracic surgical and angiographic interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kodikara et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Aortic arch branching patterns (n=219). Male gender vs. Female gender was evaluated on Aortic arch branching pattern variations (OR 0.792, 95% CI 0.327-1.917, p=0.605). In a Sri Lankan population, the prevalence of aortic arch variations was 10%, with no significant gender influence on the branching pattern (OR 0.792).
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: