Key result
Angiotensin II as a primary vasopressor in vasodilatory hypotension was associated with lower ICU mortality compared to conventional vasopressors.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using angiotensin II as a primary vasopressor for vasodilatory hypotension in critically ill adults.
Does angiotensin II as a primary vasopressor improve clinical and renal outcomes in critically ill adults with vasodilatory hypotension compared to conventional vasopressors?
Observational (n=120)
No
Does angiotensin II as a primary vasopressor improve clinical and renal outcomes in critically ill adults with vasodilatory hypotension compared to conventional vasopressors?
In critically ill adults with vasodilatory hypotension, primary use of angiotensin II was associated with lower ICU mortality and fewer troponin elevations compared to conventional vasopressors, though it did not significantly improve overall renal outcomes or 90-day survival.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ang2 as primary vasopressor in vasodilatory shock is hypothesis-generating; leaves open its comparative efficacy and safety versus conventional agents.
Objective: The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using angiotensin II (Ang2) as primary vasopressor for vasodilatory hypotension. Methods: This was a prospective observational study of critically ill adults admitted to an academic intensive care unit (ICU) with vasodilatory hypotension. We treated 40 patients with Ang2 as primary vasopressor and compared them with 80 matched controls who received conventional vasopressors (norepinephrine, vasopressin, metaraminol, epinephrine, or combinations). Results : Mean age was 63 years and median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score was 65. Ang2 patients had lower ICU mortality (10% vs 26%, P = 0.04); however, their 28- and 90-day mortality was not significantly different (18% vs 29%, P = 0.18; 22% vs 30%, P = 0.39). Peak serum creatinine levels were similar (128 vs 126 μmol/L, P = 0.81), as was the incidence and stage of acute kidney injury (70% vs 74%, P = 0.66), requirement for continuous renal replacement therapy (14% vs 13%, P = 0.84), and risk of major adverse kidney events at 7 days (20% vs 29%, P = 0.30). However, Ang2 patients with prior exposure to renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors had a lower peak serum creatinine ( P = 0.03 for interaction) than conventional vasopressors patients, and serum troponin elevations were less common with Ang2 (8% vs 22%, P = 0.04). The incidence of thromboembolic complications was similar. Conclusions: Primary Ang2 administration in vasodilatory hypotension did not seem harmful compared with conventional vasopressors. Although Ang2 did not decrease peak serum creatinine levels or major adverse kidney events, its effects on intensive care unit survival, serum troponin, and renal function in patients on renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors warrant further exploration in randomized trials (ACTRN12621000281897).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
See et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Vasodilatory hypotension (n=120). Angiotensin II (Ang2) vs. Conventional vasopressors (norepinephrine, vasopressin, metaraminol, epinephrine, or combinations) was evaluated on ICU mortality (p=0.04). Angiotensin II as a primary vasopressor in vasodilatory hypotension was associated with lower ICU mortality compared to conventional vasopressors.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: