Key result
Angiotensin-II treatment significantly improved oxygenation in patients with ARDS and refractory vasodilatory shock, increasing the PaO2/FiO2 ratio at 48 hours by a baseline-adjusted mean difference of 98.4 mmHg compared to placebo.
Why the study?
The physiological effects of renin-angiotensin system modulation in acute respiratory distress syndrome remain controversial and have not been investigated in randomized trials.
Does angiotensin-II treatment improve oxygenation in patients with ARDS and refractory vasodilatory shock?
RCT (n=81)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does angiotensin-II treatment improve oxygenation in patients with ARDS and refractory vasodilatory shock?
Mean Difference: 98.4 (95% CI 35.2–161.5)
Absolute Event Rate: 265% vs 164%
p-value: p=0.0028
In patients with ARDS and refractory vasodilatory shock, angiotensin-II treatment significantly improved oxygenation compared to placebo, independent of catecholamine dose reduction.
Angiotensin-II may aid oxygenation rescue in refractory ARDS shock; extends limited RCT data on non-catecholamine vasopressors.
Background The physiological effects of renin-angiotensin system modulation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remain controversial and have not been investigated in randomized trials. We sought to determine whether angiotensin-II treatment is associated with improved oxygenation in shock-associated ARDS. Methods Post-hoc subgroup analysis of the Angiotensin Therapy for High Output Shock (ATHOS-3) trial. We studied patients who met modified Berlin ARDS criteria at enrollment. The primary outcome was PaO 2 /FiO 2 -ratio (P:F) at 48-h adjusted for baseline P:F. Secondary outcomes included oxygenation index, ventilatory ratio, PEEP, minute-ventilation, hemodynamic measures, patients alive and ventilator-free by day-7, and mortality. Results Of 81 ARDS patients, 34 (42%) and 47 (58%) were randomized to angiotensin-II or placebo, respectively. In angiotensin-II patients, mean P:F increased from 155 mmHg (SD: 69) at baseline to 265 mmHg (SD: 160) at hour-48 compared with no change with placebo (148 mmHg (SD: 63) at baseline versus 164 mmHg (SD: 74) at hour-48)(baseline-adjusted difference: + 98.4 mmHg [95%CI 35.2–161.5], p = 0.0028). Similarly, oxygenation index decreased by − 6.0 cmH 2 O/mmHg at hour-48 with angiotensin-II versus − 0.4 cmH 2 O/mmHg with placebo (baseline-adjusted difference: -4.8 cmH 2 O/mmHg, [95%CI − 8.6 to − 1.1], p = 0.0273). There was no difference in PEEP, minute ventilation, or ventilatory ratio. Twenty-two (64.7%) angiotensin-II patients had sustained hemodynamic response to treatment at hour-3 versus 17 (36.2%) placebo patients (absolute risk-difference: 28.5% [95%CI 6.5–47.0%], p = 0.0120). At day-7, 7/34 (20.6%) angiotensin-II patients were alive and ventilator-free versus 5/47(10.6%) placebo patients. Day-28 mortality was 55.9% in the angiotensin-II group versus 68.1% in the placebo group. Conclusions In post-hoc analysis of the ATHOS-3 trial, angiotensin-II was associated with improved oxygenation versus placebo among patients with ARDS and catecholamine-refractory vasodilatory shock. These findings provide a physiologic rationale for trials of angiotensin-II as treatment for ARDS with vasodilatory shock. Trial Registration : ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT02338843 (Registered January 14th 2015).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leisman et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with refractory vasodilatory shock (n=81). Angiotensin II vs. Placebo plus standard vasopressors was evaluated on PaO2/FiO2-ratio (P:F) at 48 hours adjusted for baseline P:F (MD 98.4, 95% CI 35.2-161.5, p=0.0028). Angiotensin-II treatment significantly improved oxygenation in patients with ARDS and refractory vasodilatory shock, increasing the PaO2/FiO2 ratio at 48 hours by a baseline-adjusted mean difference of 98.4 mmHg compared to placebo.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: