Key result
A systematic transesophageal echocardiography examination correctly identified 96% of mitral segments compared to 70% with standard TEE (P<0.001), improving localization of mitral pathology.
Why the study?
Does a systematic six-view TEE examination improve the precise identification of the anatomic location and mechanism of mitral regurgitation compared to standard TEE in patients undergoing mitral surgery?
Cohort (n=24)
Does a systematic six-view TEE examination improve the precise identification of the anatomic location and mechanism of mitral regurgitation compared to standard TEE in patients undergoing mitral surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 96% vs 70%
p-value: p=<0.001
A systematic six-view TEE examination significantly improves the precise localization of pathology and identification of mitral segments in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery.
May aid precise mitral segment localization in surgical TEE; extends observational data but leaves clinical impact open.
UNLABELLED: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a major determinant of outcome in cardiac surgery. The location and mechanism of mitral lesions determine the approach to various repairs and their feasibility. Because of incomplete evaluations or change in patient condition, detailed intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examination of the mitral valve may be required. We hypothesized that a systematic TEE mitral valve examination would allow precise identification of the anatomic location and mechanism of MR in patients undergoing mitral surgery. We designed a systematic mitral valve examination consisting of six views: five-chamber, four-chamber, two-chamber anterior, two-chamber mid, two-chamber posterior and short-axis. We used this examination prospectively in 13 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery for severe MR and compared the results with the surgical findings. We then retrospectively interpreted 11 similar patients who had undergone intraoperative TEE studies before this examination. TEE correctly diagnosed the mechanism and precise location of pathology in 12 of 13 patients in the prospective group, but in only 6 of 10 patients in the retrospective group. TEE also correctly identified 75 of 78 mitral segments (96%) as being normal or abnormal. In the retrospective group, only 42 of 60 segments (70%) were correctly identified (P < 0.001). We conclude that this systematic TEE mitral valve examination improves identification of mitral segments and precise localization of pathologies and may also improve the diagnosis of the mechanism of MR. IMPLICATIONS: In this article, we describe how a systematic examination of the mitral valve by using transesophageal echocardiography allows identification of the different segments of the mitral valve, precise localization of pathology, and helps to diagnose the mechanism of mitral regurgitation. This is important in determining an approach to mitral valve repair and its feasibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lambert et al. (1999) conducted a cohort in Severe mitral regurgitation (n=24). Systematic transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) mitral valve examination vs. Standard intraoperative TEE was evaluated on Correct identification of mitral segments as normal or abnormal (p=<0.001). A systematic transesophageal echocardiography examination correctly identified 96% of mitral segments compared to 70% with standard TEE (P<0.001), improving localization of mitral pathology.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: