Key result
Prophylactic preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump insertion is supported by evidence in cardiac surgery patients with at least two high-risk criteria, such as LVEF <30-40% or left main stem disease.
Why the study?
Does a prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump prior to cardiac surgery improve outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Systematic Review
Does a prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump prior to cardiac surgery improve outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump insertion is supported prior to cardiac surgery in high-risk patients meeting specific criteria such as low LVEF, left main stem disease, unstable angina, or redo-operation.
Supports prophylactic preoperative IABP in high-risk cardiac surgery patients with ≥2 criteria; reinforces Level 1 evidence for targeted use.
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether there is a group of patients who would benefit from a prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump prior to cardiac surgery. Altogether 110 papers were found using the reported search, of which seven presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that there is evidence to support preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump insertion in patients with two of left ventricular ejection factor <30 or 40%, left main stem disease, unstable angina or redo-operation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joel Dunning (2003) conducted a systematic review in Cardiac surgery. Prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump was evaluated. Prophylactic preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump insertion is supported by evidence in cardiac surgery patients with at least two high-risk criteria, such as LVEF <30-40% or left main stem disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: