Why the study?
Is elective stenting of unprotected left main coronary stenosis safe and effective in selected patients?
Case Report (n=7)
Is elective stenting of unprotected left main coronary stenosis safe and effective in selected patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This early case series demonstrates the feasibility and safety of elective stenting for unprotected left main coronary disease in selected patients.
For the 12-mo period of 1995, we encountered seven consecutive patients with symptomatic unprotected left main coronary stenosis requiring revascularization. There were five males and two females, age ranging 48-76 years. One patient was referred to coronary bypass surgery. Of the remaining six patients, three refused surgery and the other three, including one with previous bypass surgery and two with previous interventional procedures, preferred percutaneous revascularization. All six had successful elective stenting of their left main coronary stenoses with the new short Palmaz-Schatz stents, P084 and PS104. There were no complications and all remained totally asymptomatic at 3-14 months followup. We conclude that with proper patient selection and the availability of appropriate stents, elective stenting of unprotected left main coronary stenosis is safe with good immediate and medium term results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wong et al. (1996) conducted a case report in Symptomatic unprotected left main coronary stenosis requiring revascularization (n=7). Elective stenting with short Palmaz-Schatz stents (P084 and PS104) was evaluated on Complications and symptom status.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: