Key result
Palmaz-Schatz stenting may offer better predictability of acute results and possibly improved long-term outcomes for unprotected left main stenoses when catheter intervention is required.
Why the study?
Does Palmaz-Schatz stenting improve acute and long-term outcomes in patients with unprotected left main stenoses requiring catheter intervention?
Population
Patients with significant unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses requiring catheter intervention
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Should not change practice; leaves open whether Palmaz-Schatz stenting improves outcomes versus angioplasty in unprotected left main disease.
Does Palmaz-Schatz stenting improve acute and long-term outcomes in patients with unprotected left main stenoses requiring catheter intervention?
Palmaz-Schatz stenting may offer better predictability of acute results and improved long-term outcomes compared to balloon angioplasty for unprotected left main stenosis when catheter intervention is required.
Laham et al. (1996) conducted a review in Unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses. Palmaz-Schatz stenting vs. Coronary artery bypass surgery or balloon angioplasty was evaluated. Palmaz-Schatz stenting may offer better predictability of acute results and possibly improved long-term outcomes for unprotected left main stenoses when catheter intervention is required.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: