Key result
Hypoxia increased high-frequency and decreased low-frequency HRV power, whereas hypercapnia decreased high-frequency and increased low-frequency HRV power in most mouse strains.
Genetic background influences centrally mediated cardiovascular responses to basic hypoxic and hypercapnic challenges in mice.
HRV responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia differ by mouse strain; leaves open whether genetic factors influence human autonomic cardiovascular control.
Heart rate variability (HRV) is a well-characterized, noninvasive means of assessing cardiac autonomic nervous system activity. This study examines the basic cardiac responses to hypoxic and hypercapnic challenges in seven strains of commonly used inbred mice (A/J, BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ, C57BL/6J, CBA/J, DBA/2J, and FVB/J). Adult male mice, 8-12 wk of age, were chronically instrumented to a femoral artery catheter for the continuous measurement of systemic arterial blood pressure and heart rate. Mice were exposed to multiple 4-min periods of hypoxia (10% O2), hypercapnia (5% CO2), and combined hypoxia/hypercapnia (10% O2 + 5% CO2). HRV was derived from pulse intervals of the blood pressure tracings. Hypoxia induced increases in high-frequency HRV power and decreased low-frequency (LF) HRV power in most strains. Hypercapnia led to decreased high-frequency HRV power and increased LF HRV power in most strains. Strain differences were most notable in regard to the concomitant exposures of hypoxia and hypercapnia, with FVB/J mice mirroring their own response to hypercapnia alone, whereas CBA/J mice mirrored their own responses to hypoxia. As blood pressure is most likely the driving factor for heart rate changes via the baroreflex pathway, it is interesting that LF, considered to reflect cardiac sympathetic activity, was negatively correlated with heart rate, suggesting that LF changes are driven by baroreflex oscillation and not necessarily by absolute sympathetic or parasympathetic activity to the heart. These findings suggest that genetic background can influence the centrally mediated cardiovascular responses to basic hypoxic and hypercapnic challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campen et al. (2005) studied this question. Hypoxia and hypercapnia was evaluated on Heart rate variability (HRV). Hypoxia increased high-frequency and decreased low-frequency HRV power, whereas hypercapnia decreased high-frequency and increased low-frequency HRV power in most mouse strains.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: