Key result
In patients hospitalized with chest pain, neither D-dimer nor fibrin monomer provided independent prognostic value for 2-year mortality.
Why the study?
Do D-dimer and fibrin monomer levels at admission predict long-term all-cause mortality in patients presenting with chest pain?
Cohort (n=871)
Do D-dimer and fibrin monomer levels at admission predict long-term all-cause mortality in patients presenting with chest pain?
D-dimer and fibrin monomer do not provide independent prognostic information for long-term mortality in patients presenting with chest pain when added to established risk factors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
D-dimer and fibrin monomer should not inform 2-year mortality risk stratification in chest pain; leaves open utility in other cohorts or endpoints.
D-dimer and fibrin monomer both reflect a prothrombotic potential. There are limited data available comparing these two markers of activated coagulation in a prospective manner in an unselected patient population presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. In addition, their role in risk stratification in patients with acute coronary syndrome is still under evaluation. Therefore, we wanted to assess the prognostic value of these markers with respect to long-term all-cause mortality in 871 patients admitted to the emergency department. Blood samples were obtained immediately following admission. After a follow-up period of 24 months, 123 patients had died. In the univariate analysis, both D-dimer and fibrin monomer predicted all-cause mortality within 2 years with an odds ratio of 7.78 (95% confidence interval, 3.95-15.33) and 4.19 (95% confidence interval, 2.42-7.28), respectively, in the highest quartile (Q4) compared with the lowest quartile (Q1). However, in the multivariable logistic regression model for death within 2 years, the odds ratio of D-dimer and fibrin monomer was 1.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 3.97) and 1.04 (95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 2.04) in Q4 compared with Q1, respectively, and added no prognostic information above and beyond age, known coronary heart disease, B-type natriuretic peptide and the index diagnoses of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris. In an unselected patient population hospitalized with chest pain and potential acute coronary syndrome, neither D-dimer nor fibrin monomer provided complementary prognostic information to established risk determinants during long-term follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brügger‐Andersen et al. (2008) conducted a cohort in Chest pain and potential acute coronary syndrome (n=871). Highest quartile (Q4) of D-dimer and fibrin monomer vs. Lowest quartile (Q1) of D-dimer and fibrin monomer was evaluated on All-cause mortality within 2 years (OR 1.80, 95% CI 0.81-3.97). In patients hospitalized with chest pain, neither D-dimer nor fibrin monomer provided independent prognostic value for 2-year mortality.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: