Key result
In isolated canine hearts, the mean left ventricular pressure-flow relationship was highly sensitive to characteristic impedance (P<0.0001), limiting its use as a contractility index.
Why the study?
Does varying arterial input impedance affect the mean ventricular pressure-flow relation in isolated canine hearts?
Does varying arterial input impedance affect the mean ventricular pressure-flow relation in isolated canine hearts?
p-value: p=<0.0001
The sensitivity of the mean left ventricular pressure-flow relationship to characteristic impedance limits its utility as an independent index of myocardial contractility.
Caution against using mean LV pressure-flow relation as contractility index in isolated hearts; leaves open relevance to clinical or in vivo assessment.
The mean left ventricular pressure-flow relationship (Pv-Fv), determined under a constant preload and variable peripheral resistance, has been proposed as a quantitative representation of ventricular pump function (9). We determined the Pv-Fv relation in seven isolated cross-perfused canine hearts by varying resistance of a simulated arterial load in five steps from 6.0 to 0.375 mmHg X s X ml-1 while keeping end-diastolic volume, inotropic state, compliance, and characteristic impedance at various constant values. All of the 27 Pv-Fv relations thus determined were moderately nonlinear. Varying end-diastolic volume at three levels shifted the relation curve in an approximately parallel fashion (P less than 0.0001). At three levels of inotropic state (mean LVP of isovolumic contractions 34.3 +/- 8.2, 48.0 +/- 6.3, and 59.2 +/- 9.6 mmHg), the Pv-Fv relation shifted with predominantly a slope change (P less than 0.0001). Changing compliance at three levels (0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 ml/mmHg) caused a statistically significant but quantitatively small crossover of the Pv-Fv curves (P less than 0.0001). Changing characteristic impedance to 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mmHg X s X ml-1 caused a highly significant (P less than 0.0001) divergence of Pv-Fv relation over the high Fv range. We conclude that this sensitivity of the Pv-Fv relation to characteristic impedance limits its use as a contractility index.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maughan et al. (1984) studied this question. Varying arterial load resistance, end-diastolic volume, inotropic state, compliance, and characteristic impedance was evaluated on Mean left ventricular pressure-flow relationship (Pv-Fv) (p=<0.0001). In isolated canine hearts, the mean left ventricular pressure-flow relationship was highly sensitive to characteristic impedance (P<0.0001), limiting its use as a contractility index.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: