PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1984Circulation Research182 citations

Effect of arterial impedance changes on the end-systolic pressure-volume relation.

View Full Paper
WMW L MaughanKSKenji SunagawaDBDaniel Burkhoff

Key Result

Increasing resistance from 1.5 to 6 mm Hg sec/ml decreased the volume intercept of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship from 5.5 to 0.6 ml (P<0.01), without changing its slope.

Key Points

  • To investigate the relationship between end-systolic pressure and volume in the left ventricle under varying arterial impedance.
  • Seven simulated arterial impedances were imposed on excised canine left ventricles using a servo-pump system.
  • Impedance parameters included resistance, capacitance, and characteristic impedance adjusted to 50, 100, and 200% of normal values.
  • The end-systolic pressure-volume relationship was measured at different preload volumes.
  • No significant change in the slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship with varying impedance parameters.
  • Volume intercept decreased significantly with resistance from 5.5 ml (1.5 mm Hg sec/ml) to 0.6 ml (6 mm Hg sec/ml), P<0.01.
  • Volume intercept decreased with characteristic impedance from 5.9 ml (0.1 mm Hg sec/ml) to 5.4 ml (0.4 mm Hg sec/ml), P<0.05.

Structured PICO

Do changes in arterial impedance affect the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship in excised canine left ventricles?

P
Population
Excised canine left ventricles connected to a servo-pump system to study the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship.
I
Intervention
Seven simulated arterial impedances (varying resistance, capacitance, and characteristic impedance to 50, 100, and 200% of normal value)
C
Comparator
Normal impedance values (resistance: 3 mm Hg sec/ml; capacitance: 0.4 ml/mm Hg; characteristic impedance: 0.2 mm Hg sec/ml)
O
Outcome
End-systolic pressure-volume relationship (slope and volume intercept)surrogate

In a canine model, the slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship is insensitive to afterload impedance changes, whereas its volume intercept is dependent on resistance and characteristic impedance.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.01

Abstract

To study the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship of left ventricle ejection against physiological afterload, we imposed seven simulated arterial impedances on excised canine left ventricles connected to a newly developed servo-pump system. We set each of the impedance parameters (resistance, capacitance, and characteristic impedance) to 50, 100, and 200% of normal value (resistance: 3 mm Hg sec/ml; capacitance: 0.4 ml/mm Hg; characteristic impedance: 0.2 mm Hg sec/ml), while leaving the other parameters normal. Under a given impedance, the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship was determined by preloading the ventricle at four different end-diastolic volumes. There was no significant change in the slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship with changes in any of the afterloading impedance parameters. However, the volume intercept of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship decreased significantly with resistance from 5.5 +/- 1.0 (SE) ml at resistance equal to 1.5 mm Hg sec/ml to 0.6 +/- 1.8 ml at resistance equal to 6 mm Hg sec/ml (P less than 0.01). The volume axis intercept also decreased with characteristic impedance, from 5.9 +/- 2.0 ml at a characteristic impedance of 0.1 mm Hg sec/ml to 5.4 +/- 2.1 ml at a characteristic impedance of 0.4 mm Hg sec/ml, (P less than 0.05). We conclude that the slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship is insensitive to a wide range of changes in afterload impedance, but its volume intercept is dependent on resistance and characteristic impedance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maughan et al. (1984) studied physiological afterload. simulated arterial impedances vs. normal value was evaluated on slope and volume intercept of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (p=<0.01). Increasing resistance from 1.5 to 6 mm Hg sec/ml decreased the volume intercept of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship from 5.5 to 0.6 ml (P<0.01), without changing its slope.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20085e77451c29e065b4dchttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.54.5.595
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper