Key result
RT-PCR targeting the VP6 gene detected avian group D rotavirus in 53% of sample pools compared to 30% by PAGE, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity for diagnostic use.
Absolute Event Rate: 53% vs 30%
The newly designed RT-PCR assay targeting the VP6 gene is a sensitive and specific method for the diagnostic detection of avian group D rotavirus.
RT-PCR may enhance avian rotavirus detection in research samples; leaves open validation before veterinary diagnostic adoption.
Group D rotaviruses (RVs-D) have been documented in birds and, while they may be common in these animals, few molecular studies are available for this specific group. In this study, specific primers for the gene that encodes for the RVs-D VP6 protein were designed and used in a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Thirty pools of samples were tested by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) yielding a 30% (9/30) positivity. These pools were subjected subsequently to RT-PCR, with a 53% (16/30) positivity rate. The sensitivity of the PCR assay was demonstrated up to a dilution of 5 × 10(-4)ng/μL (0.5 pg/μL) of the cloned VP6 gene. The four samples were sequenced and showed 90.8-91.1% similarity with regards to the RVs-D VP6 gene. To assess for specificity our RT-PCR was applied to nine samples known to contain enteric viral agents other than group D rotaviruses including picobirnavirus, rotavirus group A, and reovirus with negative results. Overall, the data confirm the specificity of the primers used for detecting the RVs-D by RT-PCR, suggesting that this assay can be used for diagnostic purposes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bezerra et al. (2012) studied Avian group D rotavirus (n=30). RT-PCR for VP6 gene vs. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) was evaluated on Positivity rate for group D rotavirus. RT-PCR targeting the VP6 gene detected avian group D rotavirus in 53% of sample pools compared to 30% by PAGE, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity for diagnostic use.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: