Key result
This article is an editorial commentary on a systematic review regarding minimum clinically important differences in total hip arthroplasty and reports no primary clinical data.
1Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada 2Research Institute of St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada K. Madden, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, T3219-50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada, Email: [email protected] This CORR Insights® is a commentary on the article "Discordance Abounds in Minimum Clinically Important Differences in THA: A Systematic Review" by Deckey and colleagues available at: DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002434. The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. The opinions expressed are those of the writer, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR® or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons®.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim Madden (2023) conducted an editorial in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). This article is an editorial commentary on a systematic review regarding minimum clinically important differences in total hip arthroplasty and reports no primary clinical data.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: