Key result
Rubber-based resistance bands of equal thickness exhibited statistical differences in mean resistance across four distributors, with high intertrial reliability (grand mean ICC 0.99).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to examine the consistency of rubber-based resistance band loading patterns across four distributors.
There is significant loading variability in rubber-based resistance bands of equal thickness across different distributors, which strength and conditioning professionals should consider.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Loading variability across band distributors warrants caution in training prescriptions; leaves open standardization needs for reproducible resistance outcomes.
Variable resistance implemented through concurrent use of rubber-based resistance bands and free weights is commonly used in training athletes. The purpose of this study was to examine the consistency of rubber-based resistance (RBR) band loading patterns across four distributors. Bands (n = 141) were obtained from online distributors (Rogue Fitness, EliteFTS, RubberBanditz, and Power Systems) across a spectrum of available widths (0.635, 1.270, 2.860, 4.450, 6.350, and 10.160 cm). At least five bands for each width were stretched in 5 cm increments from resting (100 cm) to twice resting length (200 cm) while tensile resistance was measured using a load cell integrated with a digital controller. Each band was tested twice on non-consecutive days producing an intertrial intraclass correlational coefficient (ICC) between 0.93–0.99 with a grand mean ICC across all repeated measures of 0.99. Statistical differences were observed in mean resistance for bands of equal thickness across distributors. Significant correlations were found between a range of tensile load expressed as a total load and band thickness (r = 0.658) and when expressed as a percentage (r = −0.386). This study is useful for strength and conditioning professionals and clinicians who should be cognizant of loading variability within both bandwidths and between distributors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fuentes et al. (2019) studied this question. Rubber-based resistance bands vs. Across distributors was evaluated on Consistency of loading patterns (tensile resistance). Rubber-based resistance bands of equal thickness exhibited statistical differences in mean resistance across four distributors, with high intertrial reliability (grand mean ICC 0.99).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: