Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The substitution-labile thiophene complex [CpRu{(S,S)-CHIRAPHOS}(SC4H4)]BF4 (2) [(S,S)-CHIRAPHOS = (2S,3S)bis(diphenylphosphanyl)butane], prepared from [CpRu{(S,S)-CHIRAPHOS}Cl] (1), thiophene, and AgBF4, reacted with the biaryl-thionolactones 3a–f to give the corresponding S-coordinated complexes 4a–f in high yields. The structure of 4c, which crystallized as the pure (S,S,P) diastereoisomer, was determined by X-ray crystallography. Coordination of the ruthenium fragment caused an elongation of the C=S bond, a contraction of the C–O bond within the lactone ring and a flattening of that ring. Single hydride transfer with LiBEt3H converted 4a–f into the thiolactolate complexes 5a–f in good yields and diastereoselectivities. An X-ray structure determination of the major isomer of 5a revealed it to be the (S,S,S,P) diastereoisomer. Protonation with NH4PF6 converted 5a–f into the corresponding ring-opened thioaldehyde complexes 6a–f. Alkylation of 5a with methyl iodide resulted in Ru–S cleavage to give the oxothioacetal 7a and [CpRu{(S,S)-CHIRAPHOS}I] (8). Full reduction of 4a–f with LiAlH4 produced the thiolate complexes 9a–f in high yields and 6–74% de. Methylation at sulfur converted 9a–c into the corresponding thioether complexes 10a–c, which were cleaved to 8 and the free methyl thioethers 11a–c without isomerization of the biaryl axis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schenk et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: