Key result
The 3-year mortality rate of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy significantly improved from 14% in the 2000-2005 cohort to 9% in the 2006-present cohort (adjusted HR 0.60), alongside increased use of evidence-based medications.
Why the study?
Does the implementation of evidence-based medication improve long-term prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=1,016)
Yes
Does the implementation of evidence-based medication improve long-term prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
The long-term prognosis of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy in Japan has significantly improved over time, coinciding with increased implementation of evidence-based medications such as beta-blockers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Improved survival in recent dilated cardiomyopathy cohorts was associated with greater evidence-based medication use; extends prior observations but leaves causality open.
BACKGROUND: Recent trends in the clinical characteristics, management and prognosis of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remain to be examined in Japan. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared 306 and 710 DCM patients in the Chronic Heart Failure Analysis and Registry in the Tohoku District (CHART)-1 (2000-2005, n=1,278) and the CHART-2 (2006-present, n=10,219) Studies, respectively. Between the 2 groups of DCM patients, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. The prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus were all significantly increased from the CHART-1 to the CHART-2 Study. The use of β-blockers and aldosterone antagonists was significantly increased, while that of loop diuretics and digitalis was significantly decreased in the CHART-2 Study. The 3-year mortality rate was significantly improved from 14% in the CHART-1 to 9% in the CHART-2 Study (adjusted HR, 0.60; 95% CI: 0.49-0.81; P=0.001). In particular, 3-year incidence of cardiovascular death was significantly decreased (adjusted HR, 0.26; 95% CI: 0.14-0.50, P<0.001), while that of HF admission was not (adjusted HR, 0.90; 95% CI: 0.59-1.37, P=0.632). The prognostic improvement was noted in patients with BNP <220 pg/ml, LVEF>40%, β-blocker use and aldosterone antagonist use. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term prognosis of DCM patients has been improved, along with the implementation of evidence-based medication in Japan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ushigome et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM) (n=1,016). CHART-2 cohort (2006-present) vs. CHART-1 cohort (2000-2005) was evaluated on 3-year mortality (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.49-0.81, p=0.001). The 3-year mortality rate of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy significantly improved from 14% in the 2000-2005 cohort to 9% in the 2006-present cohort (adjusted HR 0.60), alongside increased use of evidence-based medications.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: