Key result
Multifactorial intensive treatment did not significantly reduce end-stage kidney failure, doubling of serum creatinine, or death compared to conventional treatment (HR 0.69, P=0.13).
Why the study?
The efficacy of multifactorial intensive treatment on renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease required evaluation.
Does multifactorial intensive treatment reduce the composite risk of end-stage kidney failure, doubling of serum creatinine, or death in patients with type 2 diabetes and advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease?
RCT (n=164)
Open-label
Block method in a 1:1 ratio
Yes
Does multifactorial intensive treatment reduce the composite risk of end-stage kidney failure, doubling of serum creatinine, or death in patients with type 2 diabetes and advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease?
In patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease, multifactorial intensive treatment did not significantly reduce the composite risk of end-stage kidney failure, doubling of serum creatinine, or death compared to conventional treatment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Intensive multifactorial treatment lacks benefit for kidney failure or death in advanced DKD; challenges extrapolation from milder-disease trials and leaves optimal strategies open.
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the efficacy of multifactorial intensive treatment (IT) on renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease (DKD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Diabetic Nephropathy Remission and Regression Team Trial in Japan (DNETT-Japan) is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial with a 5-year follow-up period. We randomly assigned 164 patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥300 mg/g creatinine, serum creatinine level 1.2-2.5 mg/dL in men and 1.0-2.5 mg/dL in women) to receive either IT or conventional treatment. The primary composite outcome was end-stage kidney failure, doubling of serum creatinine or death from any cause, which was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: The IT tended to reduce the risk of primary end-points as compared with conventional treatment, but the difference between treatment groups did not reach the statistically significant level (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.43-1.11; P = 0.13). Meanwhile, the decrease in serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level and the use of statin were significantly associated with the decrease in primary outcome (hazard ratio 1.14; 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.23, P < 0.001 and hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.998, P < 0.05, respectively). The incidence of adverse events was not different between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of kidney events tended to decrease by IT, although it was not statistically significant. Lipid control using statin was associated with a lower risk of adverse kidney events. Further follow-up study might show the effect of IT in patients with advanced diabetic kidney disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shikata et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes (n=164). Multifactorial intensive treatment vs. Conventional treatment was evaluated on Composite of end-stage kidney failure, doubling of serum creatinine, or death from any cause (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.43-1.11, p=0.13). Multifactorial intensive treatment did not significantly reduce end-stage kidney failure, doubling of serum creatinine, or death compared to conventional treatment (HR 0.69, P=0.13).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: