Key result
Intensive multifactorial treatment cuts composite kidney outcomes ~38% vs. conventional therapy.
Why the study?
The long-term efficacy of intensive multifactorial treatment in advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease remains unclear despite recent therapeutic advances in slowing kidney disease progression.
Does intensive multifactorial treatment reduce the composite of doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage kidney disease, or all-cause death in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease?
RCT (n=164)
Open-label
1:1
Yes
Does intensive multifactorial treatment reduce the composite of doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage kidney disease, or all-cause death in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease?
Hazard Ratio: 0.62 (95% CI 0.41–0.93)
Absolute Event Rate: 53.4% vs 76.3%
p-value: p=0.021
Intensive multifactorial treatment provides long-term kidney protection in patients with advanced diabetic kidney disease, highlighting the importance of sustained comprehensive risk-factor management.
Supports intensive multifactorial treatment to lower kidney risk in advanced diabetic kidney disease; extends prior evidence with long-term follow-up.
Introduction Despite recent therapeutic advances in slowing kidney disease progression, the long‐term efficacy of intensive multifactorial treatment in advanced‐stage diabetic kidney disease remains unclear. We assessed long‐term kidney outcomes through the 5‐year Diabetic Nephropathy Remission and Regression Team Trial in Japan (DNETT‐Japan) and an additional 5‐year post‐trial observational follow‐up. Materials and Methods A total of 164 patients with advanced‐stage diabetic kidney disease (urinary albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio ≥ 300 mg/g and serum creatinine 1.2–2.5 mg/dL in men and 1.0–2.5 mg/dL in women) were randomly assigned to intensive multifactorial treatment—targeting glycemic, blood pressure, and lipid control with lifestyle modification—or conventional treatment for 5 years. After the intervention, an additional 5‐year observational follow‐up was conducted. The primary outcome was the composite of a doubling of serum creatinine, end‐stage kidney disease, or all‐cause death. Results Forty‐four patients who were free of the primary outcome during the intervention entered the follow‐up study. The risk of the primary outcome was lower in the intensive multifactorial treatment group versus the conventional treatment group (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.41–0.93; P = 0.021). Increases in systolic blood pressure (per 10 mmHg) and serum low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (per 10 mg/dL) during the intervention were associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 1.43 [1.15–1.78] and 1.23 [1.12–1.35], respectively). Discussion The benefit of 5‐year intensive multifactorial treatment on kidney outcomes was demonstrated during an additional 5‐year follow‐up period, highlighting the importance of sustained comprehensive risk‐factor management in advanced‐stage diabetic kidney disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shikata et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease (n=164). Intensive multifactorial treatment vs. Conventional treatment was evaluated on Composite of a doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage kidney disease, or all-cause death (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.93, p=0.021). Intensive multifactorial treatment reduced the risk of the primary composite kidney outcome by 38% compared to conventional treatment (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.93, P=0.021).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: