Why the study?
How are echovirus 6 antibodies distributed in various body fluids after natural infection in children?
How are echovirus 6 antibodies distributed in various body fluids after natural infection in children?
After acute enterovirus infection, the appearance of gammaG antibody in spinal fluid likely reflects increased transport of serum antibody rather than local production.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
GammaG in CSF after enterovirus infection likely reflects serum transport rather than local production; leaves open diagnostic interpretation of fluid-specific antibodies.
By employing the techniques of radioimmunodiffusion and autoradiography and by using (32)P-labeled echovirus 6 as the antigen, the distribution of echovirus 6 antibody in serum, nasopharynx, rectum, and spinal fluid was studied in a group of children with naturally acquired echovirus type 6 infection, with or without meningeal involvement. The response in serum was characterized by sequential appearance of gammaM, gammaG, and rarely of gammaA antibody. The secretory response in the nasopharynx and rectum was limited to secretory gammaA immunoglobulin. The response in spinal fluid was limited to gammaG immunoglobulin. gammaG echovirus antibody appeared in the spinal fluid with or without demonstrable replication of virus in the spinal fluid. It is suggested that, after short-term acute infection with enteroviruses, the appearance of gammaG antibody in spinal fluid may largely be a reflection of increased transport of serum antibody, particularly of gammaG immunoglobulin class.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pearay L. Ogra (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: