Key result
In patients with congenital heart disease, the S-ICD adequately terminated ventricular tachycardia in 15% of patients, with inappropriate shocks in 10% and no system-related infections.
Why the study?
Long-term data on S-ICD use are limited, particularly in subgroups with difficult anatomic conditions such as adult patients with congenital heart disease.
Does the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) safely and effectively treat ventricular arrhythmias in adult patients with congenital heart disease?
Cohort (n=20)
No
Does the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) safely and effectively treat ventricular arrhythmias in adult patients with congenital heart disease?
The S-ICD appears safe and effective for the prevention of sudden cardiac death in adult patients with congenital heart disease, with rare and manageable inappropriate shocks.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports S-ICD feasibility in congenital heart disease; leaves open need for randomized trials before practice change.
AIMS: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICDTM) is an important advance in device therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although current guidelines recommend S-ICDTM use, long-term data are still limited, especially in subgroups such as adult patients with congenital heart diseases. This cohort is of high interest because of the difficult anatomic conditions in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: All S-ICDTM patients with an underlying congenital heart disease (CHD) resulting in an indication for ICD implantation (n = 20 patients) in our large-scaled single-centre S-ICDTM registry (n = 249 patients) were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, appropriate and inappropriate shocks, and complications were documented in a mean follow-up of 36 months. Primary prevention of SCD was the indication for implantation of an S-ICDTM in six patients (30%). Of all 20 patients with an overall mean age of 40.5 ± 11.5 years, 12 were male (60%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 46.5 ± 11.3%. Nine episodes of ventricular tachycardia (two monomorphic and seven polymorphic) were adequately terminated in three patients (15%). In two patients, T-Wave-Oversensing resulting in an inappropriate shock was observed, which could be managed by changing the sensing vector or activation of the SMART PASSTM filter. There were no S-ICDTM system-related infections. In one patient, surgical revision was necessary due to a persistent haematoma. CONCLUSION: The S-ICDTM seems to be a valuable option for the prevention of SCD in patients with various CHDs and complex anatomical anomalies. The S-ICDTM is safe and works effectively, also in these complex patients. Inadequate shock delivery was rare and could be managed by reprogramming.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Willy et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Congenital heart disease (n=20). Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) was evaluated on Appropriate and inappropriate shocks, and complications. In patients with congenital heart disease, the S-ICD adequately terminated ventricular tachycardia in 15% of patients, with inappropriate shocks in 10% and no system-related infections.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: