Why the study?
Are ventricular late potentials on signal-averaged ECG associated with the presence of viable myocardium after anterior myocardial infarction?
Are ventricular late potentials on signal-averaged ECG associated with the presence of viable myocardium after anterior myocardial infarction?
Ventricular late potentials detected by signal-averaged ECG at discharge are associated with the presence of viable myocardium after anterior myocardial infarction.
Signal-averaged ECG late potentials may support noninvasive viability assessment after anterior MI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between myocardial viability (MV) detected by Tl‐201 rest/redistribution protocol (RR‐SPECT) and the presence of ventricular late potentials (VLPs) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We analyzed signal‐averaged ECGs (SAECGs) in 28 patients (age 57 ± 10 years) with a first anterior AMI within 48 hours of symptoms (SAECG1) and prior to discharge (SAECG2). VLPs were defined according to the presence of filtered QRS (QRS‐D) > 114 ms and duration of low amplitude signals (LAS) a 30 ms or root mean square voltage (RMS40) < 25 μ;V, using a 25‐Hz filter, or a duration of LAS > 39 ms or RMS40 < 20 μ;V, using a 40‐Hz filter. RR‐SPECT was performed 17 ± 6 days after AMI. Segments were considered viable when counts were > 60% in early images or when a fill‐in > 10% was detectable on delayed images of those segments with a first count between 31% and 59%. Methods: Patients were divided into two groups: with MV (group 1 = 16 patients) if almost one third of segments appeared to be viable; without MV (group 2 = 12 patients). No difference was found between the two groups in SAECG1, whereas, using a 25‐Hz filter, a greater QRS‐D (106.6 ± 13.5 vs 93.5 ± 6 ms) and LAS (31.2 ± 8.7 vs 18.1 ± 6.4 ms) as well as a smaller RMS40 (43 ± 33.5 vs 71.3 ± 30.4 μ;V) characterized the SAECG2 of group 1. Sensitivity and specificity of VLPs in detecting MV were 31% and 100%. When using cut‐off values derived from median distribution of the population (QRS‐D & 99 ms, LAS a 24 ms and RMS40 > 51 μ;V), sensitivity raised to 75% and specificity was 92% with a positive and negative predictive value of 92% and 73%. Conclusions: The presence of MV is associated with a greater incidence of VLPs. SAECG performed at the time of discharge may facilitate the identification of patients with μ;V after anterior AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tarricone et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: