Key result
Important sex-related differences exist in valvular heart disease presentation and outcomes, highlighting the need for sex-specific treatment criteria to ensure timely referral and optimal management.
Why the study?
Important sex-related differences exist in valvular heart disease presentation, treatment, and outcomes, but females remain under-referred or face delayed referral, underscoring the need to examine gender differences as transcatheter treatments evolve.
Highlights the importance of considering sex-related differences in clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of valvular heart disease in the era of transcatheter therapies.
Sex differences may inform valvular management in the transcatheter era; leaves open the need for prospective validation.
Available data have demonstrated important sex-related differences in patients with valvular heart disease, regarding clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes. Although the calcific aortic stenosis (AS) is more frequent in men compared to women, the majority of AS patients over 80 years old are women, in whom fibrotic remodeling of aortic valve is typically found. Mitral valve disease is more common in women. However females are under-referred or delayed referrals to treatment, probably due to the absence of sex-based LV dimension values guiding surgical timing. The development of transcatheter devices have revolutionized the treatment of valvular heart disease and increased the interest in this topic. In this context, the consideration of gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, treatment success, and prognosis is of great importance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aurigemma et al. (2023) conducted a review in Valvular heart disease. Transcatheter valve treatment was evaluated. Important sex-related differences exist in valvular heart disease presentation and outcomes, highlighting the need for sex-specific treatment criteria to ensure timely referral and optimal management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: