Key result
Most neurosurgeons restart antithrombotics for AF within ~4 weeks after traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.
Why the study?
Anti-thrombotic medications are typically stopped acutely after traumatic intracranial haemorrhage, but guidance on safe recommencement is limited.
Cross-Sectional (n=62)
This survey highlights significant variability in neurosurgical practices regarding the recommencement of anti-thrombotics after traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, establishing clinical equipoise for a randomized trial comparing early (1 week) versus late (4 weeks) resumption.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Practice varies widely among UK neurosurgeons; leaves open optimal antithrombotic resumption timing after tICH and supports randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION Traumatic intracranial haemorrhage (tICH) commonly follows falls in elderly people, around half of whom are taking anti-thrombotic (AT) medications pre-injury. ATs are typically stopped acutely, but guidance on safe recommencement is limited. RESEARCH QUESTION We surveyed UK neurosurgical consultants to understand variations in AT recommencement practice and inform trial design. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online cross-sectional survey was distributed via the Society of British Neurological Surgeons mailing list to assess self-reported consultant practice regarding cessation and recommencement of AT therapy following tICH. RESULTS Sixty-two consultant neurosurgeons responded. Following tICH most are very likely or likely to stop AT therapy for AF (92%), stroke prevention (85-90%), or previous MI (78%). There was greater variation when managing those with cardiac stents, with only 59% stopping ATs. Recommencement typically occurred at two weeks post-injury in both conservatively (50%) and surgically (40%) managed patients, with ∼80% of neurosurgeons restarting ATs within four weeks. Most defined early AT resumption to be one-week (72%), while late resumption was more varied at four (39%) and six (31%) weeks. Willingness to randomise was highest in lower-risk cases. More caution was shown to randomising patients with cardiac indications for AT therapy, greater injury severity, and reduced consciousness. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION These findings highlight the need for better evidence and guidance in this patient group. Based on the survey findings, a trial design targeting patients on AT therapy for AF or secondary VTE prevention, randomised to early (<7 days) versus late (4 weeks) resumption appears a relevant trial question.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Read et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Traumatic intracranial haemorrhage (n=62). Anti-thrombotic therapy recommencement timing was evaluated on Self-reported timing of anti-thrombotic recommencement. A survey of 62 UK neurosurgeons revealed that 92% stop anti-thrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation following traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, with 80% restarting therapy within four weeks.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: