This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The influence of rough surfaces on fluid flow is characterized by the downward shift in the logarithmic layer of velocity and temperature profiles, namely the velocity roughness function Δ U + and the corresponding temperature roughness function Δ Θ + . Their computation relies on computational simulations, and hence a simple prediction without such simulation is envisioned. We present a framework where a data-driven model is developed using the dataset of Yang et al. 2023 (Yang et al. 2023). with 93 high-fidelity direct numerical simulations of a fully-developed turbulent channel flow at R e τ ≈ 800 and P r = 0 . 71 . The model provides robust predictive capabilities (mean squared error MSE k = 0 . 09 and MSE θ = 0 . 096 ), but lacks interpretability. Simplistic statistical roughness parameters provide a more understandable route, so the framework is extended with a symbolic regression approach to distill an empirical correlation from the data-driven model. The derived expression leads to a predictive correlation for the equivalent sand-grain roughness k s = k 99 ( E S x ( − E S x + S k + 2 . 37 ) + 0 . 772 ) with reasonable predictive powers. The predictive capability of the temperature roughness function is subject to limitations due to the missing Prandtl number variation in the dataset. Nevertheless, the interpretable correlation and the neural network as well as the original dataset can be used to explore the roughness functions. The functional form of the derived correlations, along with visual analysis of these surfaces, suggests a strong relationship with roughness wavelengths, further linking them to explanations based on sheltered and windward regions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dalpke et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: