Key result
This review highlights ongoing controversies in the diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease, particularly regarding diagnostic guidelines and the use of desmopressin versus VWF concentrates.
This review highlights ongoing controversies in the diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease, including the lack of standardized regimens for desmopressin and prophylactic VWF infusions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Guideline discordance on type 1 VWD diagnosis sustains variable practice; leaves open need for consensus criteria to standardize care and future trials.
Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder in the world. The spectrum of VWD spans quantitative and qualitative deficiencies of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a platelet adhesive protein. It manifests primarily as mucocutaneous bleeding, but severely affected patients may suffer soft tissue bleeding and hemarthroses. There is disagreement in the multiple guidelines published regarding diagnosis, especially of type 1 VWD, which also remains the most opaque with respect to molecular characterization. Treatment with desmopressin (DDAVP) is most effective in type 1 VWD, but regimens are not standardized. It is not clear which type 2 VWD patients with qualitative deficiencies can be treated with DDAVP and which ones should receive VWF concentrates. No guidelines stipulate which patients might benefit from prophylactic VWF infusions and how they should be dosed. These are some current controversies in VWD that are discussed in this review.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anne T. Neff (2015) conducted a review in Von Willebrand disease (VWD). This review highlights ongoing controversies in the diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease, particularly regarding diagnostic guidelines and the use of desmopressin versus VWF concentrates.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: