Key result
Obesity was associated with higher epicardial fat volume (70.2 vs. 56.1 mL/m2) and worse longitudinal and circumferential strain compared to non-obese individuals (P<0.05 for all).
Why the study?
CMR may detect early signs of cardiomyopathy, prompting evaluation of whether epicardial fat volume, T1-relaxation times, and LV strain differ between non-obese and obese individuals with normal LVEF.
Are epicardial fat volume, T1-relaxation times, and left ventricular strain altered in obese individuals with normal ejection fraction compared to non-obese individuals?
Cross-Sectional (n=75)
Are epicardial fat volume, T1-relaxation times, and left ventricular strain altered in obese individuals with normal ejection fraction compared to non-obese individuals?
Absolute Event Rate: 70.2% vs 56.1%
p-value: p=<0.05
Multi-parametric CMR reveals that obesity is associated with increased epicardial fat volume and subclinical left ventricular dysfunction despite a normal ejection fraction.
May signal early obesity cardiomyopathy via CMR in low-risk obese adults; leaves open whether parameters predict progression or warrant intervention.
Background Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may detect early signs of cardiomyopathy. Purpose The purpose of this CMR study was to evaluate epicardial fat volume (EFV), T1-relaxation times (T1), and left ventricular (LV) strain in non-obese (<30 kg/m 2 ) and obese (>30 kg/m 2 ) individuals with no other cardiovascular risk factor and with a normal LV ejection fraction (LVEF) to detect early changes of obesity cardiomyopathy. Material and Methods Seventy-five individuals (38 men) without additional cardiovascular risk factors were examined at 1.5 T. EFV was assessed by a 3D-Dixon sequence. A 3(3)3(3)5 MOLLI scheme was used to assess T1 (ms). Myocardial strain (%) was evaluated by longitudinal (LS) and circumferential strain (CS) analysis. Results Obese individuals (n = 34; age = 55.6 ± 13.8 years; BMI = 33.4 ± 2.9 kg/m 2 ) had higher EFVs (70.2 ± 27.9 vs. 56.1 ± 25.2 mL/m 2 ; P < 0.05) and T1 values (991.0 ± 38.6 vs. 974.6 ± 32.0; P = 0.061) as well as worse LS and CS values (LS = −21.0 ± 4.8 vs. −23.2 ± 3.7; CS = −23.8 ± 5.7 vs. −27.7 ± 4.2; P < 0.05, for all) compared to non-obese individuals (n = 41; age = 57.2 ± 15.5 years; BMI = 25.1 ± 2.3 kg/m 2 ). Individuals with severe obesity (BMI > 35 kg/m 2 ) had a significantly higher T1 compared to non-obese (1010.5 ± 39.9 vs. 974.6 ± 32.0 ms; P < 0.05). There were no significant differences regarding age or gender. Conclusion Obesity is associated with an increased EFV and a disturbed LV contractility despite a normal LVEF. Myocardial fibrosis as well as metabolic and inflammatory mechanisms of increased epicardial fat may play role. Multi-parametric CMR may be a valuable tool for the detection of such early signs of an obesity cardiomyopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Homsi et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Obesity (n=75). Obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2) vs. Non-obese individuals (BMI < 30 kg/m2) was evaluated on Epicardial fat volume (EFV) in mL/m2 (p=<0.05). Obesity was associated with higher epicardial fat volume (70.2 vs. 56.1 mL/m2) and worse longitudinal and circumferential strain compared to non-obese individuals (P<0.05 for all).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: