This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Despite extensive research to identify biomarkers of response in patients with non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), there is no biomarker to date that can serve this purpose. Herein, we report how we leveraged serial urine samples to query a panel of cytokines at varying time points in an attempt to identify predictive biomarkers of response in NMIBC. Methods: Serial urine samples were collected from 50 patients with intermediate- or high-risk NMIBC enrolled in a phase II study, evaluating intravesical BCG ± intradermal HS-410 therapy. Samples were collected at baseline, week 7, week 13, week 28, and at end of treatment. A total of 105 cytokines were analyzed in each sample. To predict outcome of time-to-event (recurrence or progression), univariate and multivariable Cox analyses were performed. Results: Fifteen patients developed recurrence and 4 patients progressed during the follow-up period. Among clinicopathologic variables, ever-smoker versus nonsmoker status was associated with an improved response rate (HR 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14–0.99; P = 0.04). In the most clinically relevant model, the percent change (for 100 units) of IL18-binding protein-a (HR 1.995; 95% CI, 1.16–3.44; P = 0.01), IL23 (HR 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01–1.23; P = 0.03), IL8 (HR 0.27; 95% CI, 0.07–1.08; P = 0.06), and IFNγ-induced protein-10 (HR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91–0.99; P = 0.04) at week 13 from baseline best predicted time to event. Conclusions: Urinary cytokines provided additional value to clinicopathologic features to predict response to immune-modulating agents in patients with NMIBC. Impact: This study serves as a hypothesis-generating report for future studies to evaluate the role of urine cytokines as a predictive biomarker of response to immune treatments.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salmasi et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: