Key result
A mitral valve sparing approach for extensive aortic root endocarditis yielded an estimated 10-year reintervention-free survival rate of 51.9% (95% CI 37.0-66.8%).
Why the study?
Aortic root abscess can spread to the intervalvular fibrous body and mitral valve, requiring complex surgical correction after radical debridement, prompting the evaluation of a mitral valve sparing approach.
Does a mitral valve sparing approach provide satisfactory clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with extensive aortic root endocarditis?
Cohort (n=60)
Yes
Does a mitral valve sparing approach provide satisfactory clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with extensive aortic root endocarditis?
A mitral valve sparing approach for extensive aortic root endocarditis is feasible in the majority of patients and offers satisfactory durability, though optimal surgical technique is crucial to minimize late reinterventions.
May support mitral sparing after radical debridement in selected cases; leaves open durability and comparative efficacy.
OBJECTIVES: Aortic root abscess can spread to include adjacent cardiac structures, including the central or intervalvular fibrous body and mitral valve. After radical debridement, complex surgical correction is needed. We describe the results of our mitral valve sparing approach. METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2020, 60 patients underwent operation for infective endocarditis of the aortic root with extension towards the mitral valve at 2 centres in the Netherlands. Early and late clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were studied. RESULTS: Prosthetic valve endocarditis was present in 42 (70%) patients and emergent or salvage surgery was performed in 8 (13%) patients. After radical debridement of all infected tissue, mitral valve repair was feasible in 48 (80%) patients. Early mortality occurred in 11 (18%) patients while mechanical circulatory support was needed in 8 (13%) patients. At 10 years after surgery, the estimated reintervention-free survival rate was 51.9% (95% confidence interval 37.0-66.8%). Eight patients underwent reintervention; this was more common in patients who underwent aortic valve rather than root replacement and in patients in whom mitral valve repair was performed without ring annuloplasty. For 48 patients who underwent mitral valve repair, the estimated freedom from recurrent mitral regurgitation rate was 64.4% (95% confidence interval 40.1-88.7%) at 10 years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical intervention for extensive infective endocarditis of the aortic root is related to reasonable perioperative morbidity and mortality. Optimal surgical technique is crucial to lower the risk of late reintervention. Mitral valve repair is feasible in the majority of patients with satisfactory durability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomšič et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Infective endocarditis of the aortic root with extension towards the mitral valve (n=60). Mitral valve sparing approach was evaluated on Reintervention-free survival rate at 10 years (95% CI 37.0-66.8). A mitral valve sparing approach for extensive aortic root endocarditis yielded an estimated 10-year reintervention-free survival rate of 51.9% (95% CI 37.0-66.8%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: