Key result
Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide was noninferior to amlodipine in reducing mean 24-hour diastolic blood pressure in black patients with hypertension (-10.2 vs -9.1 mm Hg; P<0.001 for noninferiority).
Why the study?
Does valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide reduce mean 24-hour diastolic blood pressure non-inferiorly to amlodipine in Black patients with stage 1 and 2 hypertension?
RCT (n=482)
Double-blind
randomized
Does valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide reduce mean 24-hour diastolic blood pressure non-inferiorly to amlodipine in Black patients with stage 1 and 2 hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: -10.2% vs -9.1%
p-value: p=<0.001 for noninferiority
In Black patients with stage 1 and 2 hypertension, a combination of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide is noninferior to high-dose amlodipine for blood pressure reduction and is associated with fewer side effects like peripheral edema.
Supports valsartan/HCTZ as a noninferior alternative to amlodipine in Black patients; extends randomized evidence for ARB-diuretic combinations in this population.
The objective of the study was to demonstrate that reduction in mean 24-hour diastolic blood pressure with 160 mg valsartan and 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide was not inferior to 10 mg amlodipine in hypertensive blacks. A total of 482 blacks with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension (mean seated blood pressure 140 to 180/90 to 110 mm Hg) were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, prospective study. After a placebo run-in period, patients were randomized to 160 mg valsartan or 5 mg amlodipine for 2 weeks, then force-titrated to 160 mg valsartan and 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide or 10 mg amlodipine for an additional 10 weeks. Blood pressure was assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Other assessments included quality of life, peripheral edema, and safety. Noninferiority of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide to amlodipine was demonstrated by comparable reductions in mean 24-hour diastolic blood pressure with both treatments (-10.2+/-8.6 mm Hg versus -9.1+/-8.3 mm Hg, respectively; P<0.001 for noninferiority), as well as in mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure (-15.9+/-12.1 mm Hg versus -14.5+/-12.2 mm Hg; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The proportion of patients reporting adverse events and the incidence of most events were similar in both treatment groups, although more patients treated with amlodipine reported peripheral edema (5.8% versus 1.7%; P=0.03) and joint swelling (2.9% versus 0%; P=0.008) compared with valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide. We conclude that a starting dose of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (160/12.5 mg) is as effective as high-dose amlodipine (10 mg) in reducing blood pressure in blacks with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension, and valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide is better tolerated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferdinand et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in Stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension (n=482). Valsartan/Hydrochlorothiazide vs. Amlodipine 10 mg was evaluated on Reduction in mean 24-hour diastolic blood pressure (p=<0.001 for noninferiority). Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide was noninferior to amlodipine in reducing mean 24-hour diastolic blood pressure in black patients with hypertension (-10.2 vs -9.1 mm Hg; P<0.001 for noninferiority).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: