Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose To investigate features and outcomes of circumscribed choroidal hemangioma by patient age. Methods Retrospective review of circumscribed choroidal hemangioma from 3/29/1967–6/4/2018 based on age at presentation (≤20 vs. >20–50 vs. >50 years). Results There were 458 circumscribed choroidal hemangiomas diagnosed at mean age (13 vs. 41 vs. 64 years, p < 0.001). The youngest age group had worse presenting visual acuity (20/400 vs. 20/150 vs. 20/100, p < 0.001), larger tumor basal diameter (13.5 vs. 6.6 vs. 6.2, p < 0.001), greater tumor thickness (5.8 vs. 3.1 vs. 2.9, p < 0.001), closer distance to foveola (0.5 vs. 1.4 vs. 1.2, p = 0.03), and greater extent of subretinal fluid (4 quadrants, 26% vs. 8% vs. 2%, p < 0.001). The youngest patients were less likely to be treated with primary observation (39% vs. 39% vs. 56%) or photodynamic therapy (10% vs. 27% vs. 22%) and more likely to be treated with plaque radiotherapy (26% vs. 6% vs. 3%) or external beam radiotherapy (13% vs. 1% vs. 0%) ( p < 0.001). The youngest patients required greater total number of treatments (mean 4 vs. 2 vs. 1, p < 0.001). At mean follow-up (44 vs. 68 vs. 60 months, p = 0.37), the youngest patients had worse visual acuity (20/400 vs. 20/200 vs. 20/100, p = 0.03), but no difference in visual acuity loss of 3 or more Snellen lines (27% vs. 13% vs. 16%, p = 0.55). Conclusion Younger patients (≤20 years) with circumscribed choroidal hemangioma present with worse visual acuity and larger, more posterior tumors. Future studies are needed to improve early detection and treatment for this subgroup of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dalvin et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: