Key result
Edoxaban 75 mg once daily increased steady-state exposure by 25% compared to 60 mg in atrial fibrillation patients with high renal clearance, without reducing stroke risk.
Why the study?
Because edoxaban is partially renally cleared, its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics needed comparison at standard and higher doses in AF patients with high renal clearance.
Does edoxaban 75 mg once daily increase plasma exposure and anti-factor Xa concentration compared to edoxaban 60 mg once daily in patients with atrial fibrillation and creatinine clearance > 100 mL/min?
RCT (n=607)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does edoxaban 75 mg once daily increase plasma exposure and anti-factor Xa concentration compared to edoxaban 60 mg once daily in patients with atrial fibrillation and creatinine clearance > 100 mL/min?
Effect estimate: Ratio of means 1.25 (95% CI 1.2-1.3)
Absolute Event Rate: 93.2% vs 74.8%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Increasing the edoxaban dose to 75 mg in AF patients with high renal clearance increases drug exposure by 25% but does not appear to provide additional clinical benefit for stroke prevention compared to the standard 60 mg dose.
Supports 60 mg edoxaban in high-CrCl AF; challenges dose escalation despite proportionally lower exposure.
Edoxaban 60 mg is approved for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) not fulfilling any dose-reduction criteria. As edoxaban is partially renally cleared (≈50%), this study compared pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of edoxaban 60 mg once daily with edoxaban 75 mg once daily in patients with AF with high renal clearance (creatinine clearance > 100 mL/min) over 12 months. Primary PK and pharmacodynamics end points were plasma edoxaban exposure and anti-factor Xa (FXa) concentration. A population PK model estimated edoxaban exposure at steady state. Efficacy and safety outcomes included composites of stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, and major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. Of 607 patients, 303 and 304 were randomized to edoxaban 60 and 75 mg, respectively. Edoxaban 75 mg provided ≈25% higher exposure than 60 mg. This increase was accurately depicted in the population PK model; anti-factor Xa concentration correlated with edoxaban exposure. Rates of composite and individual outcomes were similarly low between doses. In conclusion, the 25% increase in edoxaban dose (60-75 mg) resulted in ≈25% exposure increase in the 75-mg group. Higher exposure was not associated with reduced stroke risk in patients with AF with high renal clearance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with high renal clearance (CrCL >100 mL/min) (n=607). Edoxaban vs. Edoxaban 60 mg once daily was evaluated on Average plasma concentration of edoxaban at steady state (Cav) (Ratio of means 1.25, 95% CI 1.2-1.3, p=<0.0001). Edoxaban 75 mg once daily increased steady-state exposure by 25% compared to 60 mg in atrial fibrillation patients with high renal clearance, without reducing stroke risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: