Key result
Ischemic preconditioning significantly decreased the relative area of monomeric C-reactive protein myocardial deposition from 44% to 21% (p=0.026) in a rat model of ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Why the study?
Monomeric C-reactive protein deposition aggravates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury, while ischemic preconditioning is cardioprotective against such injury, but the effects of ischemic preconditioning on myocardium with deposited monomeric C-reactive protein were unclear.
Does ischemic preconditioning reduce infarct size and monomeric C-reactive protein deposition in a rat model of ischemia-reperfusion injury?
Does ischemic preconditioning reduce infarct size and monomeric C-reactive protein deposition in a rat model of ischemia-reperfusion injury?
Absolute Event Rate: 21% vs 44%
p-value: p=0.026
Ischemic preconditioning significantly decreases the deposition of monomeric CRP in damaged myocardium in a rat model of ischemia-reperfusion injury, suggesting a potential cardioprotective mechanism.
May support anti-inflammatory mechanism of ischemic preconditioning; leaves open translation to human ischemia-reperfusion injury.
BACKGROUND: The deposition of monomeric C-reactive protein (mCRP) in the myocardium aggravates ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and myocardial infarction. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is known to protect the myocardium against IRI. METHODS: We evaluated the effects of IPC on myocardium upon which mCRP had been deposited due to IRI in a rat model. Myocardial IRI was induced via ligation of the coronary artery. Direct IPC was applied prior to IRI using multiple short direct occlusions of the coronary artery. CRP was infused intravenously after IRI. The study included sham (n=3), IRI-only (n=5), IRI+CRP (n=9), and IPC+IRI+CRP (n=6) groups. The infarcted area and the area at risk were assessed using Evans blue and 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium staining. Additionally, mCRP immunostaining and interleukin-6 (IL-6) mRNA reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction were performed. RESULTS: In the IRI+CRP group, the infarcted area and the area of mCRP deposition were greater, and the level of IL-6 mRNA expression was higher, than in the IRI-only group. However, in the IPC+IRI+CRP group relative to the IRI+CRP group, the relative areas of infarction (20% vs. 34%, respectively; p=0.079) and mCRP myocardial deposition (21% vs. 44%, respectively; p=0.026) were lower and IL-6 mRNA expression was higher (fold change: 407 vs. 326, respectively; p=0.376), although the difference in IL-6 mRNA expression was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: IPC was associated with significantly decreased deposition of mCRP and with increased expression of IL-6 in myocardium damaged by IRI. The net cardioprotective effect of decreased mCRP deposition and increased IL-6 levels should be clarified in a further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2021) studied Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury with mCRP deposition (n=23). Ischemic preconditioning vs. Ischemia-reperfusion injury with CRP infusion (IRI+CRP) was evaluated on Relative area of mCRP myocardial deposition (p=0.026). Ischemic preconditioning significantly decreased the relative area of monomeric C-reactive protein myocardial deposition from 44% to 21% (p=0.026) in a rat model of ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: