Key result
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation did not promote changes in hemodynamic and respiratory responses compared to sham stimulation in patients in the immediate postoperative period of cardiac surgery.
Why the study?
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation may intensify rehabilitation after cardiac surgery, but its hemodynamic and respiratory responses, feasibility, and safety in the immediate postoperative period required evaluation.
Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation improve hemodynamic and respiratory responses in patients in the immediate postoperative period of cardiac surgery?
RCT (n=30)
Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation improve hemodynamic and respiratory responses in patients in the immediate postoperative period of cardiac surgery?
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation does not significantly alter hemodynamic or respiratory responses in the immediate postoperative period following cardiac surgery.
NMES elicits no hemodynamic or respiratory changes early after cardiac surgery; supports safety for early rehabilitation trials.
Background: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation seems to be a promising option to intensify the rehabilitation and improve the exercise capacity of patients in the immediate postoperative period of cardiac surgery. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the hemodynamic (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean blood pressure) and respiratory (respiratory rate and oxygen saturation) responses to neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the immediate postoperative period in patients submitted to cardiac surgery and to verify its feasibility and safety. Methods: This is a pilot randomized controlled trial, wherein critical patients in the immediate postoperative period of cardiac surgery were randomly assigned to a control group, using sham neuromuscular electrical stimulation, or an experimental group, submitted to neuromuscular electrical stimulation sessions (FES), for 60 min, with a 50-Hz frequency, 200-µs pulse duration, time on: 3 s, and time off: 9 s. Data distribution was evaluated by the Shapiro-Wilk test. The analysis of variance was used and a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Thirty patients were included in the study. The neuromuscular electrical stimulation was applied within the first 23.13 ± 5.24 h after cardiac surgery, and no changes were found regarding the hemodynamic and respiratory variables between the patients who underwent neuromuscular electrical stimulation, and those in the control group. Conclusions: In the present study, neuromuscular electrical stimulation did not promote changes in hemodynamic and respiratory responses of patients in the immediate postoperative period of cardiac surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cerqueira et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Immediate postoperative period of cardiac surgery (n=30). Neuromuscular electrical stimulation vs. Sham neuromuscular electrical stimulation was evaluated on Hemodynamic and respiratory responses. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation did not promote changes in hemodynamic and respiratory responses compared to sham stimulation in patients in the immediate postoperative period of cardiac surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: