Key result
Electrical muscle stimulation is linked to ~31% greater knee extension improvement after complicated cardiac surgery.
Why the study?
The effectiveness of electrical muscle stimulation in patients with complicated early postoperative period after cardiac surgery was evaluated due to unclear benefits.
Does electrical muscle stimulation improve muscle performance and exercise capacity in patients with a complicated early postoperative period after cardiac surgery?
Does electrical muscle stimulation improve muscle performance and exercise capacity in patients with a complicated early postoperative period after cardiac surgery?
Electrical muscle stimulation improves lower extremity muscle strength in patients recovering from a complicated early postoperative period after cardiac surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid post-cardiac surgery rehabilitation; leaves open effects on exercise capacity and outcomes in randomized trials.
Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) in patients with the complicated early postoperative period after cardiac surgery.Methods. 61 patients (44 men and 17 women) aged 52-70 years with the complicated early postoperative period after cardiac surgery were included in the study. The complications included prolonged length of stay in the intensive care unit and prolonged mechanical ventilation. The initial muscle performance of the lower extremities was measured with the carpal and isokinetic dynamometer in all patients. The six-minute walk test was performed in all patients after they had been transferred to the department of cardiac surgery.Results. Patients in the study group had reduced lower extremity muscle strength at baseline, compared with the control group. After the EMS sessions, the study group patients demonstrated pronounced improvements in muscle performance as compared to the control group. Both knee-joint extension values increased during the isometric contraction as compared to those in the control group (38.8% and 40.0% versus 8.1% and 8.4%, p <0.001), similarly to right knee-joint flexion (23.7% versus 10.1%, p = 0.008), left ankle joint (18.6 versus 4.3%, p = 0.010), right-hand grip strength (18.3 versus 11.1%, p = 0.042). In addition, the six-minute walk test results improved in the EMS group (119.72% (293 meters) and 87.13% (315 meters)) as compared to the control group (p = 0.079).Conclusion. The EMS sessions did not affect the clinical status of cardiac surgical patients with the complicated postoperative period. Moreover, it appeared to be beneficial in terms of the improved lower extremity muscle strength that was more pronounced in the study group than in the control group. Therefore, the effects of EMS on the clinical status of these patients require the further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sumin et al. (2020) studied complicated early postoperative period after cardiac surgery (n=61). Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) vs. Control group was evaluated on Increase in knee-joint extension values during isometric contraction (p=<0.001). Electrical muscle stimulation improved knee-joint extension during isometric contraction compared to control in patients after complicated cardiac surgery.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: