Key result
Embolic protection devices for carotid stenting, including distal and proximal protection strategies, are reviewed to assess their efficacy in reducing the risk of periprocedural stroke.
Why the study?
Do embolic protection devices decrease the risk of periprocedural stroke during carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid arteriosclerosis?
Do embolic protection devices decrease the risk of periprocedural stroke during carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid arteriosclerosis?
This review highlights the evolutionary advances in embolic protection devices aimed at reducing periprocedural stroke risk during carotid artery stenting.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Embolic protection in carotid stenting requires prospective validation; current literature leaves open its routine use for stroke prevention.
Stroke is one of the most significant causes of death and morbidity worldwide. Atherosclerotic stenosis of the extracranial internal carotid artery has been invoked as a common causative factor for stroke in over 20% of patients. Although medical therapy can help to prevent the onset and progression of carotid arteriosclerosis, open surgical carotid endarterectomy has been the gold standard for treating severe blockage. Carotid artery stenting has recently demonstrated efficacy in stroke prevention from atherosclerosis, and in high-risk surgical subgroups, has been shown to be associated with a reduction in the risk of myocardial infarction. The controversy for carotid stenting surrounds the incidence of periprocedural stroke. Will embolic protection devices (EPDs) decrease this risk? EPDs continue to evolve with various engineering strategies directed at increasing the efficiency of protection. There are two major categories of EPDs: distal occlusion, either with balloons (e.g., Percusurge, Medtronic Corporation, MN, USA); or distal filtration (e.g., Angioguard, Cordis Corporation, NJ, USA). The second method is proximal protection (e.g., MoMA device, Invatec Corporation, Brescia, Italy). We review the results of trials currently evaluating carotid stenting with both distal and proximal embolic protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ansel et al. (2008) conducted a review in Atherosclerotic stenosis of the extracranial internal carotid artery. Carotid stenting with embolic protection devices (EPDs) was evaluated. Embolic protection devices for carotid stenting, including distal and proximal protection strategies, are reviewed to assess their efficacy in reducing the risk of periprocedural stroke.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: