Key result
Blockade of ETB1 receptors with RES-701-1 enhanced ET-1 constriction by approximately 60% and reverted the constriction to completely ETA receptor-mediated in the rabbit basilar artery.
ET-1-induced ETB2 receptor-mediated constriction of the rabbit basilar artery is dependent on ETB1 receptor activation, without which constriction reverts to completely ETA receptor mediated.
Animal data on ETB1 blockade should not guide ET antagonist use; leaves open ETB1-ETB2 interactions in human cerebrovascular disease.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether endothelin (ET)-1 activation of ETB1 receptors influences the relative magnitude of ETA/ETB2 receptor-mediated ET-1 constriction in the rabbit basilar artery. Initial challenge of ET-1-constricted vessels with BQ610, an ETA-receptor antagonist, resulted in approximately 60% relaxation, and subsequent addition of BQ788, an ETB1/2-receptor antagonist, relaxed the remaining constriction. To test whether blockade of ETB1 receptors influenced the relative magnitude of ETA/ETB2 receptor-mediated constriction, ET-1-constricted vessels were exposed to RES-701-1, an ETB1-receptor antagonist, before challenge with BQ610 or BQ788. RES-701-1 enhanced the ET-1 constriction by approximately 60%, consistent with blockade of ETB1 receptor-mediated endothelium-dependent relaxation. In ET-1-constricted vessels treated with RES-701-1, BQ610 challenge resulted in complete relaxation, whereas BQ788 was without effect. However, when 10 nM acetylcholine was added to RES-701-1-treated ET-1-constricted vessels, (a) BQ610 challenge resulted in only approximately 30% relaxation, and subsequent BQ788 addition relaxed the remaining constriction; and (b) BQ788 challenge resulted in approximately 35% relaxation, and subsequent BQ610 addition relaxed the remaining constriction. Acetylcholine induced approximately 10% relaxation of RES-701-1-treated ET-1-constricted vessels. It is speculated that a dynamic relation exists between ETA and ETB2 receptor-mediated constriction, such that ET-1-induced ETB2 receptor-mediated constriction of the basilar artery is dependent on ETB1 receptor activation and, in the absence of this activation, the constriction reverts to completely ETA receptor mediated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zuccarello et al. (1999) studied this question. RES-701-1 (ETB1-receptor antagonist) vs. Unblocked ET-1-constricted vessels was evaluated on Vessel relaxation/constriction. Blockade of ETB1 receptors with RES-701-1 enhanced ET-1 constriction by approximately 60% and reverted the constriction to completely ETA receptor-mediated in the rabbit basilar artery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: