Key result
A combined Clinical Dementia Rating and cognitive battery approach identified all 24 dementia converters at 2 years, with an overall concordance of 65.3% between the ratings (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does a combined clinical and cognitive approach improve the identification of older adults at-risk of cognitive decline compared to single approaches?
Cohort (n=740)
Does a combined clinical and cognitive approach improve the identification of older adults at-risk of cognitive decline compared to single approaches?
Effect estimate: κ=0.44
p-value: p=<0.001
A combined clinical and cognitive approach may be more practical in screening for MCI participants with diverse educational and cultural backgrounds.
May support combined CDR-cognitive screening for dementia risk in diverse MCI groups; leaves open superiority over single approaches.
Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is a recognized risk condition for clinical dementia. This paper attempted to explore the applicability of a combined cognitive and clinical approach to identify older Chinese adults at-risk of cognitive decline. Seven hundred forty randomly recruited community dwelling participants (aged 60 or over) were assessed at baseline and 2 years with Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and a cognitive battery. Baseline MCI groups were categorized by CDR-MCI, cognitive function (Cog-MCI), and a combined CDR-Cog approach. The cognitive approach adopted the Mayo clinic criteria. For the combined approach, nonamnestic MCI combined CDR 0.5 plus nonmemory cognitive deficits. The overall concordance between CDR and Cognitive test ratings were 65.3% (χ2 = 256.4, P<0.001, κ=0.44). With a combined approach, 424 (57%) participants were classified as normal. CDR-MCI group had higher cognitive scores compared with MCI groups by other criteria (1 way analysis of variance or ANOVA). At 2 years, the combined CDR-Cog MCI group identified all dementia (N=24) converters although group differences were not significant. Cognitive function and CDR identified participants potentially at-risk for furthermore decline, but exhibited some differences in detection profiles. A combined approach may be more practical in screening for MCI participants with diverse educational and cultural background.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lam et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Mild Cognitive Impairment (n=740). Combined Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and cognitive battery vs. Individual criteria (CDR-MCI or Cog-MCI) was evaluated on Overall concordance between CDR and Cognitive test ratings (κ=0.44, p=<0.001). A combined Clinical Dementia Rating and cognitive battery approach identified all 24 dementia converters at 2 years, with an overall concordance of 65.3% between the ratings (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: