Key result
Adding non-invasive ventilation to deep sedation during atrial fibrillation ablation maintained better intraprocedural pH (7.37 vs 7.32, p=0.001) compared to deep sedation alone.
Why the study?
Does adding non-invasive ventilation to deep sedation improve respiratory homeostasis in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Cohort (n=72)
Does adding non-invasive ventilation to deep sedation improve respiratory homeostasis in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Adding non-invasive ventilation to deep sedation during atrial fibrillation ablation is feasible and helps maintain better respiratory homeostasis and arterial blood gas balance.
May support NIV for better respiratory parameters in AF ablation; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Anesthetic management of patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation has specific requirements. The feasibility of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) added to deep sedation procedure was evaluated. Seventy-two patients who underwent ablation procedure were retrospectively revised, performed with (57%) or without (43%) application of NIV (Respironic(®) latex-free total face mask connected to Garbin ventilator-Linde Inc.) during deep sedation (Midazolam 0.01-0.02 mg/kg, fentanyl 2.5-5 μg/kg and propofol: bolus dose 1-1.5 mg/kg, maintenance 2-4 mg/kg/h). In the two groups (NIV vs deep sedation), differences were detected in intraprocedural (pH 7.37 ± 0.05 vs 7.32 ± 0.05, p = 0.001; PaO2 117.10 ± 27.25 vs 148.17 ± 45.29, p = 0.004; PaCO2 43.37 ± 6.91 vs 49.33 ± 7.34, p = 0.002) and in percentage variation with respect to basal values (pH -0.52 ± 0.83 vs -1.44 ± 0.87, p = 0.002; PaCO2 7.21 ± 15.55 vs 34.91 ± 25.76, p = 0.001) of arterial blood gas parameters. Two episodes of respiratory complications, treated with application of NIV, were reported in deep sedation procedure. Endotracheal intubation was not necessary in any case. Adverse events related to electrophysiological procedures and recurrence of atrial fibrillation were recorded, respectively, in 36% and 29% of cases. NIV proved to be feasible in this context and maintained better respiratory homeostasis and better arterial blood gas balance when added to deep sedation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sbrana et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=72). Non-invasive ventilation added to deep sedation vs. Deep sedation alone was evaluated on Intraprocedural pH (p=0.001). Adding non-invasive ventilation to deep sedation during atrial fibrillation ablation maintained better intraprocedural pH (7.37 vs 7.32, p=0.001) compared to deep sedation alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: