Key result
Viral uptake in individual shellfish varied 10- to 100-fold, and while depuration cleansed most shellfish, a few still harbored minimal amounts of virus.
Viral depuration of shellfish shows high individual variability in virus uptake, but shellfish with minimal viral pollution are cleansed more rapidly, supporting the feasibility of field trials.
High individual variability cautions against relying solely on depuration for shellfish safety; supports hypothesis-generating field trials.
A study was carried out to further evaluate the practicability of viral depuration by assaying individual shellfish. The Northern quahaug and a strain of the type 1 attenuated poliovirus were used as the working model. Two types of depuration systems were employed: the small experimental tanks and a pilot-size tank with a capacity of approximately 24 bushels (836 liters) of shellfish. Volumes of the individual shellfish samples were found uniform throughout the experiments when a prior selection for the weight of the shellfish was made. There was also no significant difference in volumes of the individual samples during the course of depuration (24 to 96 hr). Under controlled hydrographic conditions, however, the uptake of virus in individual shellfish varied considerably. In general, the individual variability reached 10- to 100-fold. This wide variation would explain the variability of viral contents obtained in pooled samples during depuration as reported previously. During a later phase of depuration, although a great majority of shellfish were free of the virus, a few still harbored minimal amounts of contaminants. The presence of virus in some of the shellfish after various periods of depuration would, theoretically, be obscured by the pooling of the sampled shellfish. Further examination of the negative samples by assaying larger quantities than those routinely used revealed that a few still contained virus. To simulate naturally polluted shellfish as closely as technically possible, shellfish were polluted with minimal amounts of virus. The shellfish were cleansed more rapidly by the depuration process than were those polluted with more virus. Since the naturally polluted shellfish were shown to contain less virus than those studied in the laboratory, it is anticipated that the former type of shellfish may be cleansed more readily by this process within a reasonable period of time. Justification for a field trial of depuration in this country is presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seraichekas et al. (1968) studied Viral contamination in shellfish. Viral depuration was evaluated on Viral content in individual shellfish. Viral uptake in individual shellfish varied 10- to 100-fold, and while depuration cleansed most shellfish, a few still harbored minimal amounts of virus.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: